Bug 1309939 - Review Request: erlang-goldrush - Small, fast event processing and monitoring for Erlang/OTP applications
Summary: Review Request: erlang-goldrush - Small, fast event processing and monitoring...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Randy Barlow
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 960392
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-02-19 03:36 UTC by Randy Barlow
Modified: 2016-02-19 22:35 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: erlang-goldrush-0.1.8-1.fc24
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-02-19 22:35:55 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
lemenkov: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Randy Barlow 2016-02-19 03:36:25 UTC
Spec URL: https://rbarlow.fedorapeople.org/erlang-goldrush.spec
SRPM URL: https://rbarlow.fedorapeople.org/erlang-goldrush-0.1.8-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description: Goldrush is a small Erlang app that provides fast event stream processing.
Fedora Account System Username: rbarlow

Comment 1 Randy Barlow 2016-02-19 03:39:43 UTC
Peter or Jeremy,

Would one of you review this for me? It is needed by erlang-lager-3.1.0, which we need to update for ejabberd-16.01.

Comment 2 Upstream Release Monitoring 2016-02-19 03:44:14 UTC
rbarlow's scratch build of erlang-goldrush-0.1.8-1.fc24.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13043449

Comment 3 Peter Lemenkov 2016-02-19 11:53:43 UTC
(In reply to Randy Barlow from comment #1)
> Peter or Jeremy,
> 
> Would one of you review this for me? It is needed by erlang-lager-3.1.0,
> which we need to update for ejabberd-16.01.

I'll review it.

Comment 4 Peter Lemenkov 2016-02-19 12:04:19 UTC
REVIEW:

[+] rpmlint is silent (or produces only messages which can be safely ignored:

lemenkov ~/Downloads: rpmlint erlang-goldrush-0.1.8-1.fc24.*
erlang-goldrush.x86_64: E: no-binary
erlang-goldrush.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings.
lemenkov ~/Downloads: 


[+] The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec.
[+] The package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines.
[+] The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license (MIT).
[+] The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included and marked as %license.
[+] The spec file is written in American English.
[+] The spec file for the package is legible.
[+] The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL.

lemenkov ~/Downloads: sha256sum 0.1.8.tar.gz*
739d8ce15049c54f7e00528edbf536f63a24fdb9dfa053d176e6f97a9832b834  0.1.8.tar.gz
739d8ce15049c54f7e00528edbf536f63a24fdb9dfa053d176e6f97a9832b834  0.1.8.tar.gz.1
lemenkov ~/Downloads:

[+] The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms. See koji link above.
[+] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
[0] No need to handle locales.
[0] The package does not contain any shared library files.
[+] Packages does not bundle copies of system libraries.
[+] The package isn't designed to be relocatable.
[+] The package owns all directories that it creates.
[+] The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings.
[+] Permissions on files are set properly.
[+] The package consistently uses macros.
[+] The package contains code, or permissible content.
[0] No large documentation files.
[+] Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application.
[0] No static libraries.
[0] No -devel sub-package.
[+] The package does not contain any .la libtool archives.
[0] Not a GUI application.
[+] The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages.
[+] All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8.

APPROVED!

Comment 5 Jeremy Cline 2016-02-19 13:20:33 UTC
Thanks for grabbing this so quickly, Peter!

Comment 6 Randy Barlow 2016-02-19 18:16:12 UTC
Thank you for the review Peter!

Comment 7 Gwyn Ciesla 2016-02-19 21:37:33 UTC
Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/erlang-goldrush


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.