This patch doesn't apply cleanly and it seems to conflict with a previous backport. How much of this is really needed for OSP7? And how far down in the releases are we expecting to go? I'm also not super happy with this backport because it adds a new config option, which is not something we normally do on backports.
(In reply to Flavio Percoco from comment #1) > This patch doesn't apply cleanly and it seems to conflict with a previous > backport. How much of this is really needed for OSP7? And how far down in > the releases are we expecting to go? > > I'm also not super happy with this backport because it adds a new config > option, which is not something we normally do on backports. RHOS7 and RHOS8 behave the same in this regard, The impact would be following: in some situations when one of the controllers goes down (especially controller-0 (first one in config)), rabbitmq clients *sometimes* (previously connected to this node) take time to reconnect since they keep trying to connect to dead rabbitmq server. It does not happen always and Usually It takes up to several minutes (personally experienced almost 5 minutes the most). I would leave the decision for the PM (not sure who the right person is) to decide. Honestly I am not sure myself how far down we are supposed to go.
Verified on python-oslo-messaging-1.8.3-6.el7ost
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017-0158.html