Bug 1312727 - Identical host name and other names in peer status
Summary: Identical host name and other names in peer status
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Gluster Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: glusterd
Version: rhgs-3.1
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Gaurav Yadav
QA Contact: storage-qa-internal@redhat.com
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-02-29 05:27 UTC by Byreddy
Modified: 2017-08-17 14:33 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-08-17 13:59:45 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Byreddy 2016-02-29 05:27:34 UTC
Description of problem:
=======================
Peer status showing identical hostname and other names in the peer status.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
=============================================================
glusterfs-3.7.5-19


How reproducible:
=================
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
===================
1. Have three nodes (n1, n2 and n3) with glusterfs-3.7.5-19 build
2. Probe node n2 from node n1
3. Again probe node n3 from node n2
4. Check peer status in all the nodes // In n1 node, you will see issue specified above

Actual results:
===============
Host name and other names are identical in peer status


Expected results:
==================
hostname and other names should be different in peer status


Additional info:

Comment 3 Atin Mukherjee 2016-02-29 05:45:21 UTC
This happens *only* when the IP address is used in peer probe. Although it seems like a bug but considering there is no functionality impact and our recommendation is to use fqdn instead of IP lowering down the priority and severity.

Comment 4 RajeshReddy 2016-02-29 07:02:28 UTC
Observed same result even if i used the host name (AWS public DNS name)

Comment 7 Gaurav Yadav 2017-08-17 13:59:45 UTC
Issue is not getting after multiple trials with latest code base, hence closing the issue.

Comment 8 Gaurav Yadav 2017-08-17 14:33:26 UTC
Issue is not getting reproduced after multiple trials with latest code base, hence closing the bug


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.