Bug 1313037 - do not install epel-release in RHEL systems
do not install epel-release in RHEL systems
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Storage Console
Classification: Red Hat
Component: ceph-installer (Show other bugs)
2
Unspecified Unspecified
unspecified Severity unspecified
: ---
: 2
Assigned To: Alfredo Deza
Rachana Patel
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2016-02-29 14:20 EST by Alfredo Deza
Modified: 2016-08-23 15:31 EDT (History)
7 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: ceph-installer-1.0.0
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-08-23 15:31:47 EDT
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Alfredo Deza 2016-02-29 14:20:04 EST
Description of problem:
ceph-ansible is installing epel-release and other dependencies that should be met by RHCS

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible: 100%


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Attempt to install RHCS on a RedHat System with the ceph-installer
2.
3.

Actual results: Tries to install ceph-release


Expected results: Does not install any other dependency because they are handled by RHCS directly


Additional info:
Comment 3 Alfredo Deza 2016-03-02 09:11:17 EST
Pull request: https://github.com/ceph/ceph-ansible/pull/588
Comment 4 Harish NV Rao 2016-03-07 00:24:56 EST
(In reply to Alfredo Deza from comment #0)
> Description of problem:
> ceph-ansible is installing epel-release and other dependencies that should
> be met by RHCS
> 
> Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
> 
> 
> How reproducible: 100%
> 
> 
> Steps to Reproduce:
> 1. Attempt to install RHCS on a RedHat System with the ceph-installer
> 2.
> 3.
> 
> Actual results: Tries to install ceph-release
Is that epel-release instead of ceph-replease?
> 
> 
> Expected results: Does not install any other dependency 
What other dependencies should not be installed?

> because they are handled by RHCS directly
> 
> 
> Additional info:
Comment 5 Alfredo Deza 2016-03-07 08:39:01 EST
(In reply to Harish NV Rao from comment #4)
> (In reply to Alfredo Deza from comment #0)
> > Description of problem:
> > ceph-ansible is installing epel-release and other dependencies that should
> > be met by RHCS
> > 
> > Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
> > 
> > 
> > How reproducible: 100%
> > 
> > 
> > Steps to Reproduce:
> > 1. Attempt to install RHCS on a RedHat System with the ceph-installer
> > 2.
> > 3.
> > 
> > Actual results: Tries to install ceph-release
> Is that epel-release instead of ceph-replease?

Good catch. I meant epel-release. Can't seem to edit that comment. Sorry for the confusion.

> > 
> > 
> > Expected results: Does not install any other dependency 
> What other dependencies should not be installed?
> 
> > because they are handled by RHCS directly
> > 
> > 
> > Additional info:
Comment 6 Harish NV Rao 2016-03-08 05:12:05 EST
Thanks Alfredo!

Need one more clarification:

> Expected results: Does not install any other dependency 
What other dependencies should not be installed?
Comment 7 Alfredo Deza 2016-03-08 09:18:50 EST
(In reply to Harish NV Rao from comment #6)
> Thanks Alfredo!
> 
> Need one more clarification:
> 
> > Expected results: Does not install any other dependency 
> What other dependencies should not be installed?

That is a bit harder to catch :( 

Basically, the deployment tool *should not* install dependencies for the storage package beforehand. EPEL is in clear violation of this.

All requirements should be "pulled in" when installing the actual package.
Comment 8 Harish NV Rao 2016-03-23 05:31:35 EDT
(In reply to Alfredo Deza from comment #7)
> (In reply to Harish NV Rao from comment #6)
> > Thanks Alfredo!
> > 
> > Need one more clarification:
> > 
> > > Expected results: Does not install any other dependency 
> > What other dependencies should not be installed?
> 
> That is a bit harder to catch :( 

we will check for epel-releases. We are not sure of how to catch other dependencies at this point of time.
> 
> Basically, the deployment tool *should not* install dependencies for the
> storage package beforehand. EPEL is in clear violation of this.
> 
> All requirements should be "pulled in" when installing the actual package.
Comment 9 Mike McCune 2016-03-28 18:11:59 EDT
This bug was accidentally moved from POST to MODIFIED via an error in automation, please see mmccune@redhat.com with any questions
Comment 14 Rachana Patel 2016-07-30 16:28:12 EDT
verified with 

ceph-ansible-1.0.5-31.el7scon.noarch
ceph - 10.2.2-29.el7cp.x86_64

- working as expected hence moving to verified.
Comment 16 errata-xmlrpc 2016-08-23 15:31:47 EDT
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016:1755

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.