Description of problem: One of the tests in ec-read-policy.t checks for READ operations in all bricks using the output of a 'gluster volume profile' command and couting lines containing "READ". This can fail if, for some reason, one or more bricks has also executed a READDIR fop. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info:
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/13575 (tests: Fix spurious failure of ec-read-policy.t) posted (#1) for review on master by Xavier Hernandez (xhernandez)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/13575 (tests: Fix spurious failure of ec-read-policy.t) posted (#2) for review on master by Raghavendra Talur (rtalur)
COMMIT: http://review.gluster.org/13575 committed in master by Jeff Darcy (jdarcy) ------ commit bf80b9005240811d931090afcfee8ca0b02f8212 Author: Xavier Hernandez <xhernandez> Date: Wed Mar 2 11:35:44 2016 +0100 tests: Fix spurious failure of ec-read-policy.t Change-Id: I5297e24dd10cbfbcd671fe630ae3e960b9daa8f8 BUG: 1313775 Signed-off-by: Xavier Hernandez <xhernandez> Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/13575 Tested-by: Raghavendra Talur <rtalur> Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins.com> NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org> CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Darcy <jdarcy>
"tests" component is for tests framework only. File a bug under test component if you find a bug in 1. any of the *.rc files under tests/ 2. run-tests.sh For everything else, the bug should be filed on 1. component which is being tested by .t file if the .t file requires fix. 2. component which is causing a valid .t file to fail in regression. I have used my best judgement here to move the bug to right component. In case of ambiguity, I have placed the blame on the .t file component. Please consider test bugs under the same backlog list that tracks other bugs in your component.
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-3.8.0, please open a new bug report. glusterfs-3.8.0 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution. [1] http://blog.gluster.org/2016/06/glusterfs-3-8-released/ [2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.gluster.user