Bug 1315154 - [RFE] celery flower support for qpid broker
Summary: [RFE] celery flower support for qpid broker
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED UPSTREAM
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Pulp
Version: 6.1.7
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
low
low vote
Target Milestone: Unspecified
Assignee: satellite6-bugs
QA Contact: Katello QA List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-03-07 05:37 UTC by Pradeep Kumar Surisetty
Modified: 2019-09-26 13:58 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-01-11 20:01:10 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Pradeep Kumar Surisetty 2016-03-07 05:37:38 UTC
Description of problem:

Flower is a web based tool for monitoring and administrating Celery clusters

Its a nice tool to have for  celery monitoring. It provides nice dashboard with celery tasks details like ( scheduled, queued, task times, failed tasks, ..etc) 

But It doesn't support qpid broker. 


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. configure flower for your pulp server

celery -A pulp.server.async.app flower --port=5555

2. open http://satserver:5555/broker
3.

Actual results:

Its not supported 


Expected results:

provide support for qpid

Additional info:

Comment 1 Brian Bouterse 2016-03-30 17:08:18 UTC
I've tried doing this myself and also found that there is not support for the Qpid broker. The worker discovery, tasks being run, utilization, and all of that works, but seeing anything about the broker state does not work.

I commented upstream about the lack of Qpid support[0]. The recommendation from mher (who I talk with on #celery) was to implement a broker class for flower [1].

[0]: https://github.com/mher/flower/issues/473#issuecomment-157513954
[1]: https://github.com/mher/flower/issues/473#issuecomment-172391854

Comment 2 Bryan Kearney 2016-07-26 19:02:17 UTC
Moving 6.2 bugs out to sat-backlog.

Comment 4 Brian Bouterse 2016-08-08 16:22:18 UTC
Actually we already had an issue on this upstream. I'm linking up the bugs now. Thanks @bbuckingham

Comment 6 pulp-infra@redhat.com 2016-11-21 18:57:21 UTC
The Pulp upstream bug status is at NEW. Updating the external tracker on this bug.

Comment 7 pulp-infra@redhat.com 2016-11-21 18:57:23 UTC
The Pulp upstream bug priority is at Normal. Updating the external tracker on this bug.

Comment 8 Michael Hrivnak 2017-01-11 20:01:10 UTC
We are going to track this upstream only, particularly since it is not part of the product. Thanks for suggesting it.

https://pulp.plan.io/issues/857


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.