Bug 1315710 - [RFE] Enable vertical list formatting
Summary: [RFE] Enable vertical list formatting
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Hammer
Version: 6.0.4
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium vote
Target Milestone: Unspecified
Assignee: Tomas Strachota
QA Contact: jcallaha
URL: http://projects.theforeman.org/issues...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-03-08 12:51 UTC by Eric Helms
Modified: 2019-09-25 21:17 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-07-27 11:35:59 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
table list (409.59 KB, image/png)
2016-06-16 15:05 UTC, jcallaha 		no flags Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Foreman Issue Tracker 13874 0 None None None 2016-04-22 15:57:27 UTC

Description Eric Helms 2016-03-08 12:51:06 UTC 
In some cases it's more readable to format array fields vertically, each one on it's line. List formatter should enable such formatting.
Comment 1 Eric Helms 2016-03-08 12:51:08 UTC 
Created from redmine issue http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/13874
Comment 2 Eric Helms 2016-03-08 12:51:12 UTC 
Upstream bug assigned to tstrachota
Comment 6 jcallaha 2016-06-16 15:05:00 UTC 
Verified in Satellite 6.2 Beta Snap 15.2

Lists are formatted correctly, with proper spacing to align entries vertically. See attached image.
Comment 7 jcallaha 2016-06-16 15:05:26 UTC 
Created attachment 1168759 [details]
table list
Comment 8 Bryan Kearney 2016-07-27 11:35:59 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016:1501
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.