Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1315965 - Number of packages in repo are not updated after incremental import
Summary: Number of packages in repo are not updated after incremental import
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Content Management
Version: 6.2.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: Unspecified
Assignee: Chris Duryee
QA Contact: Katello QA List
URL: http://projects.theforeman.org/issues...
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1314299
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-03-09 07:24 UTC by Jitendra Yejare
Modified: 2019-09-26 13:58 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-07-27 09:26:44 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Foreman Issue Tracker 14109 0 Normal Closed incremental import does not work 2020-07-12 14:25:25 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2016:1501 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Red Hat Satellite 6.2 Capsule and Server 2016-07-27 12:28:58 UTC

Description Jitendra Yejare 2016-03-09 07:24:40 UTC
Description of problem:
Number of packages after incremental import are not updated or else the incremental import doesnt seems to be functional.

The output says 100 % completed and no error in bg logs but still the number of packages are not updated or else the result is false.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Satellite 6.2 snap 2.1

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. From upstream satellite, Export incremental repo.
2. Copy the exported repo contents to /var/www/html
3. Use the step 2 location with file:///<location> to perform incremental import in downstream org/satellite.

Actual results:
The output says 100 % completed and no error in bg logs but still the number of packages are not updated or else the result is false.

Expected results:
The number of packages updated after incremental repo import or incremental import works.

Additional info:

Comment 2 Chris Duryee 2016-03-10 00:02:47 UTC
Incremental import was broken, I was calling a dynflow task using old parameters that had since been updated.

Comment 3 Bryan Kearney 2016-03-10 01:01:48 UTC
Upstream bug component is Content Management

Comment 4 Bryan Kearney 2016-03-10 19:01:51 UTC
Moving to POST since upstream bug http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/14109 has been closed
-------------
Chris Duryee
Applied in changeset commit:katello|e2c0a70723503e77740f914c1d0ac71fbf8ea3a9.

Comment 5 Jitendra Yejare 2016-03-22 13:49:12 UTC
Verified this bug in Sat 6.2 snap 4.

This issue is no more reproducible.

I am able to import the repo incrementally with file:///<location> and the number of packages were updated successfully.

So, changing the status to Verified.

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2016-07-27 09:26:44 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016:1501


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.