Bug 1316526 - Review Request: jo - Command-line to create JSON objects
Summary: Review Request: jo - Command-line to create JSON objects
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1925709
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-03-10 12:12 UTC by Kenjiro Nakayama
Modified: 2021-02-07 16:25 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-02-07 16:25:09 UTC
Type: Bug


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Kenjiro Nakayama 2016-03-10 12:12:54 UTC
Spec URL: https://kenjiro.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/jo/jo.spec
SRPM URL: https://kenjiro.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/jo/jo-0.8-1.fc23.src.rpm
Description: Command-line to create JSON objects
Fedora Account System Username: kenjiro

Comment 2 Sascha Spreitzer (Red Hat) 2016-06-21 15:09:53 UTC
Hi Kenjiro

I will be reviewing this package.

Kind regards
Sascha

Comment 3 Kenjiro Nakayama 2016-06-21 15:30:14 UTC
Thank you, Sascha!

Comment 4 Robert Führicht 2017-08-16 08:03:16 UTC
Hey,

I hope this is ok to drop here.

jo has been bumped to 1.1, I've created a RPM last week for EPEL7. Most significant differences in my spec file are using the release tarball instead of the commitish-named tarball and the reliance on pandoc to (re)build the docs.

----------snip-----------
Name:           jo
Version:        1.1
Release:        2%{?dist}
Summary:        JSON output from a shell
Group:          Applications/Text
License:        GPLv2+
URL:            https://github.com/jpmens/jo
Source0:        https://github.com/jpmens/jo/releases/download/v%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz

BuildRequires:  autoconf
BuildRequires:  automake
BuildRequires:  pandoc 

%description
A small utility to create JSON objects

%prep
%setup -q
rm -f %{name}.1

%build
autoreconf -i
%configure
make %{?_smp_mflags}
make %{name}.1
make %{name}.md

%install
make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}

%clean
make distclean
rm -f %{name}.1 %{name}.md

%files
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc README AUTHORS COPYING %{name}.md
%{_bindir}/%{name}
%{_mandir}/man1/%{name}.1*

%changelog
* Wed Aug 16 2017 Robert Führicht <robert.fuehricht> - 1.1-2
- add rpmlint suggestions
- add bit from Kenjiro Nakayama's take on jo 1.0

* Fri Aug 11 2017 Robert Führicht <robert.fuehricht> - 1.1-1
- initial packaging
----------snip-----------

Comment 5 Fabian Affolter 2019-05-29 19:46:14 UTC
Kenjiro, can you please provide an updated SPEc file? Thanks.

Comment 7 Fabian Affolter 2019-09-02 15:03:07 UTC
I assume that this review is dead. Or am I wrong?

Comment 8 Kenjiro Nakayama 2019-09-09 08:55:17 UTC
Hi Fabian, sorry for my late response.
Daein Park <dapark> is interested in releasing this package, so I would like to hand over it to him.

Comment 9 Daein Park 2019-09-10 03:28:09 UTC
Hi Fabian, sorry for late response too.

Would you review updated spec and srpm of this package ?

Update to v1.2 of jo :
- SPEC URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bysnupy/toolbox/master/jo/jo.spec
- SRPM URL: https://github.com/bysnupy/toolbox/raw/master/jo/jo-1.2-1.fc30.src.rpm

Thanks a lot,
Daein

Comment 10 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2020-06-22 14:44:45 UTC
(In reply to Daein Park from comment #9)
> Hi Fabian, sorry for late response too.
> 
> Would you review updated spec and srpm of this package ?
> 
> Update to v1.2 of jo :
> - SPEC URL:
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bysnupy/toolbox/master/jo/jo.spec
> - SRPM URL:
> https://github.com/bysnupy/toolbox/raw/master/jo/jo-1.2-1.fc30.src.rpm
> 
> Thanks a lot,
> Daein

If you're still interested, open your own bug and mark this one as duplicate. You can tag me and I'll review it. The bug reporter should be the same as the one who requests the repo later, otherwise it is refused.

Comment 11 Ben Beasley 2021-02-07 16:25:09 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1925709 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.