Bug 1316860 - Rules are not firing as expected in BusinessRulesTask
Summary: Rules are not firing as expected in BusinessRulesTask
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED EOL
Alias: None
Product: JBoss BPMS Platform 6
Classification: Retired
Component: BRE
Version: 6.2.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
urgent
high
Target Milestone: ER2
: 6.3.0
Assignee: Mario Fusco
QA Contact: Tibor Zimanyi
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1316862 1316867
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-03-11 10:26 UTC by Martin Weiler
Modified: 2020-03-27 19:02 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-03-27 19:02:32 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker DROOLS-1089 0 Major Resolved Reentrant working memory actions aren't flushed immediately even when eager evaluation is forced 2016-09-29 10:06:53 UTC

Description Martin Weiler 2016-03-11 10:26:11 UTC
Description of problem:
Platform issue for https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1089

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create a process with multiple BusinessRulesTask
2. Create related rules where the LHS constraint evaluates the existence of an object (eg. $p : Person())
3. Objects are passed into the BusinessRulesTask using the Input/Output mapping

Actual results:
Some rules are not fired

Expected results:
All rules are fired

Additional info:

Comment 1 Kris Verlaenen 2016-03-16 15:21:40 UTC
Mario, https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1089 mentions this has been fixed on master, could this be cherry-picked to 6.4.x for 6.3 release?

Setting blocker flag for 6.3 as this has also been requested for 6.2.3

Comment 2 Kris Verlaenen 2016-03-16 15:27:30 UTC
Never mind previous comment, already cherry picked to 6.4.x:
https://github.com/droolsjbpm/drools/commit/05d8440befa7b886ed21e7244937911032f3f564

Comment 3 Tibor Zimanyi 2016-04-01 11:29:47 UTC
Verified by running reproducer from linked BZ [1].

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316867


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.