RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1318853 - [RFE]virt-viewer: https proxy for spice not implemented yet
Summary: [RFE]virt-viewer: https proxy for spice not implemented yet
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
Classification: Red Hat
Component: virt-viewer
Version: 8.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Virt Viewer Maint
QA Contact: Virtualization Bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1051149 1318850 1318857
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-03-18 02:03 UTC by David Jaša
Modified: 2022-12-22 22:43 UTC (History)
15 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 1318850
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-07-13 15:36:45 UTC
Type: Feature Request
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHELPLAN-23059 0 None None None 2022-12-22 22:43:23 UTC

Description David Jaša 2016-03-18 02:03:12 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1318850 +++

Description of problem:
RFE bug 1051149 has two part - authentication, which was verified successfully and https which was not tested and doesn't work.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
RHEL 7.2: spice-gtk3-0.26-5.el7.x86_64
RHEV 3.6: mingw-virt-viewer-2.0-8
RHEL 6.6: spice-gtk-0.26-7.el6.x86_64   // for sake of completeness

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. have CA cert and server cert/key pair, add this line to squid.conf in addition to "http_port ..." line:
https_port 3129 key=/path/to/pem_key cert=/path/to/pem_cert
2. set SPICE_PROXY env var to https://name_in_certificate_Subject_CN/:
  * windows cmd: set SPICE_PROXY=...
  * linux shel: export SPICE_PROXY=... (or SPICE_PROXY=... remote-viewer ...)
3. add CA cert to system-wide trust store in the client:
  * windows: Trusted Root Authorities in certmgr.msc (per-user) or mmc (system)
  * linux: using update-certificates(8) or trust(1)
4. connect to the VM through proxy

Actual results:
error dialog with "Unacceptable TLS certificate" message pops up

Expected results:
connection through proxy is established

Additional info:

Comment 1 Yaniv Kaul 2016-05-08 10:48:15 UTC
Looks like a missing feature to me.

Comment 2 Yaniv Lavi 2016-05-09 10:57:23 UTC
oVirt 4.0 Alpha has been released, moving to oVirt 4.0 Beta target.

Comment 6 Pavel Grunt 2016-06-21 07:23:56 UTC
According to the discussion in the original bug 1318850 ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318850#c21 ) it requires more investigation and new api in glib. It is not a regression (I agree with the comment 1 that it is a feature), we don't have the solution upstream -> moving


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.