Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1319309 - duplicate key value violates unique constraint errors
Summary: duplicate key value violates unique constraint errors
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Content Management
Version: 6.0.4
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: Unspecified
Assignee: John Mitsch
QA Contact: jcallaha
URL: http://projects.theforeman.org/issues...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-03-18 19:09 UTC by John Mitsch
Modified: 2019-09-25 21:17 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-07-27 09:28:00 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Foreman Issue Tracker 13085 0 Normal Closed duplicate key value violates unique constraint errors 2021-01-12 13:00:58 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2016:1501 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Red Hat Satellite 6.2 Capsule and Server 2016-07-27 12:28:58 UTC

Description John Mitsch 2016-03-18 19:09:10 UTC
This seems to be related to rails 4, errors that look like

PG::Error: ERROR:  duplicate key value violates unique constraint "index_katello_repository_package_groups_on_pgid_repoid"
DETAIL:  Key (package_group_id, repository_id)=(3, 2) already exists.
: INSERT INTO katello_repository_package_groups (package_group_id, repository_id, created_at, updated_at) VALUES (3, 2, '2016-01-08 14:28:11 UTC', '2016-01-08 14:28:11 UTC'), (4, 2, '2016-01-08 14:28:11 UTC', '2016-01-08 14:28:11 UTC')
409 Conflict

are popping up somewhat randomly.

One way to possibly recreate:
1. create repo, 2. sync repo, 3. create content view, 4. add repo to view, 5. publish view 

also is seen during katello:reset         

possibly race conditions?

Comment 1 John Mitsch 2016-03-18 19:09:12 UTC
Created from redmine issue http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/13085

Comment 2 John Mitsch 2016-03-18 19:09:43 UTC
Note that this is a transient error and will not happen every time you publish a content view

Comment 5 John Mitsch 2016-03-30 16:09:48 UTC
PR open upstream https://github.com/Katello/katello/pull/5902

Comment 6 Bryan Kearney 2016-03-30 18:11:51 UTC
Moving to POST since upstream bug http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/13085 has been closed
-------------
John Mitsch
Applied in changeset commit:katello|c92c13fa113533fc8cf255e9d12038a4069067ec.

Comment 7 jcallaha 2016-04-06 20:46:54 UTC
Verified in Satellite 6.2 Beta Snap 6 Compose 2.

No longer able to reproduce the issue with over 50 publishes and promotions.

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2016-07-27 09:28:00 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016:1501


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.