Bug 1319699 - squidGuard and legal problem
Summary: squidGuard and legal problem
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: squidGuard   
(Show other bugs)
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Gwyn Ciesla
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-Legal
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-03-21 11:04 UTC by mejiko
Modified: 2016-03-23 19:39 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-03-23 19:39:51 UTC
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description mejiko 2016-03-21 11:04:09 UTC 
Hello.

squidGuard included URL Blacklist.

This list license is not find, and copyright infomation is not find.

And, Blacklist is contain illegal domain and URL. (I think)

Is this is legal ? 
I think that it is illegal, legal problematic.

NOTE: I am not a legal professional.

And I think that this is non-free.


I suggest that resolve legal problem.

Thanks.
Comment 1 Tom "spot" Callaway 2016-03-23 19:39:51 UTC 
It's a list of websites. I doubt such a thing is copyrightable. Also, while the content on those websites might be illegal or morally questionable, we're not distributing the content of those websites, just a list of URLs.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.