Bug 1320516 - URL redirect loop while accessing invalid subpath for katello pages
Summary: URL redirect loop while accessing invalid subpath for katello pages
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1108783
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite
Classification: Red Hat
Component: WebUI
Version: 6.2.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
high vote
Target Milestone: Unspecified
Assignee: Walden Raines
QA Contact: Katello QA List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-03-23 12:02 UTC by Roman Plevka
Modified: 2019-04-01 20:27 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-04-06 20:29:09 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 1315876 0 unspecified CLOSED Clicking content view url from Dashboard -> 'Content View History' results in url redirect loop 2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC

Internal Links: 1315876

Description Roman Plevka 2016-03-23 12:02:19 UTC 
Description of problem:
For all katello pages - on accessing invalid subpath (e.g. http://sat.server.com/activation_keys/foo) the URL redirect loop occurs finally resulting in ISE.

- after a brief investigation it looks like it's the bastion_katello.js library which is causing this.
-no errors in logs, only perfectly handled GET requests.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
6.1.8
6.2.0 Snap #4

How reproducible:
akways

Steps to Reproduce:
1. navigate to some katello page
2. add some invalid subpath, e.g. '/foo'
3. enojoy the perpetuum mobile

Actual results:
URL redirect loops happens overloading the server, resulting in ISE

Expected results:
HTTP/400 page as for Foreman pages

Additional info:
Comment 1 Roman Plevka 2016-03-23 12:14:56 UTC 
> Expected results:
> HTTP/400 page as for Foreman pages

Correction: HTTP 404
Comment 3 Walden Raines 2016-04-05 18:41:05 UTC 
Is this really a blocker?  The only way to get to one of these invalid paths is to manually type it in the address bar.
Comment 4 Roman Plevka 2016-04-06 18:25:59 UTC 
I don't mind removing a blocker flag. What's more, this seems to be a duplicate of:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108783
Comment 5 Walden Raines 2016-04-06 20:29:09 UTC 
Yes, I think it is a duplicate of bug #1108783.  I am going to close this as such and put bug #1108783 into 6.2.0.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1108783 ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.