Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.
Bug 13211 - ping ignores -c and -w options for non-local hosts
ping ignores -c and -w options for non-local hosts
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 8724
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: netkit-base (Show other bugs)
i386 Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Jeff Johnson
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2000-06-29 10:21 EDT by bernd
Modified: 2008-05-01 11:37 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2000-07-18 06:34:47 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description bernd 2000-06-29 10:21:45 EDT
The following works only if a host is on the local subnet and down:
ping -c 5 down.local.network (or ping -w 5 down.local.network)

For non local host, this will run forever or until stopped by Ctrl-C:
ping -w 2 down.remote.network
PING down.remote.network (aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd) from (rrr.sss.ttt.uuu) 56(84)
bytes of data.
(time passes, much more than 2 seconds, pressing Ctrl-C)
--- down.remote.network ping statistics ---
43 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss

The same happens with '-c 2'.

RedHat 6.1, netkit-base-0.10-37.
The problem does not exist in RedHat 5.2 (netkit-base-0.10-13).
Comment 1 bernd 2000-07-18 06:34:45 EDT
This bug will be propably marked as a duplicate of bug 8724, with the suggestion
to install iputils from the rawhide distribution.  Two comments:
a) iputils from rawhide can not be installed with the standard rpm
command          (error message: "only packages with major numbers <= 3 are
supported by this     version of RPM")
b) It is in my eyes a bad idea to put a bugfix for one package (netkit-base)in
   a package with a different name (iputils).  That breaks the idea behind
the      -F option of the rpm command.  At least for distributions that come
with         netkit-base there should also be fix with the same name.
Comment 2 Pekka Savola 2000-07-18 18:09:36 EDT
If this is important for you, I suggest you install rpm-3.0.5 binary from
ftp://ftp.rpm.org/pub/rpm/test/ and --rebuild iputils SRPM using it.  That way
you can use it in 6.x too.

I agree that "change" of package name can be unfortunate, but you just can't
stick to certain names and contents forever and also try to maintain full
backward compatibility; That'd be just too much work.  Linux world is developing
and changing rapidly :). Critical bugfixes and security issues are usually
packported though.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 8724 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.