Bug 1321130 - [restraint] rhts_sync_set: command not found
Summary: [restraint] rhts_sync_set: command not found
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Restraint
Classification: Retired
Component: general
Version: 0.1.24
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: 0.1.25
Assignee: Bill Peck
QA Contact: tools-bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-03-24 18:04 UTC by PaulB
Modified: 2016-08-26 04:48 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-08-26 04:48:03 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)
add missing underscore versions of sync/block commands (3.42 KB, patch)
2016-03-28 14:37 UTC, Bill Peck
no flags Details | Diff

Description PaulB 2016-03-24 18:04:16 UTC
Description of problem:
 multihost testing fails due to: 
  rhts_sync_set: command not found

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
 restraint: 0.1.24-1.el6 

Actual results:
https://beaker.engineering.redhat.com/recipes/2592674
https://beaker.engineering.redhat.com/recipes/2592674/tasks/39411080/results/193915166/logs/resultoutputfile.log
---<-snip->--- 
rhts_sync_set: command not found
---<-snip->---

Expected results:
restraint recognises task rhts* commands

Additional info:
-spoke with bpeck about this
-these are legacy rhts commands
-restraint is aware of rhts-* commands
-not rhts_* commands

bpeck said he will make restraint smarter :)

Comment 1 Bill Peck 2016-03-28 14:37:09 UTC
Created attachment 1140889 [details]
add missing underscore versions of sync/block commands

Change-Id: I21e051b9b1195d88eab8f2c9b8b9ad1170c2a98e

Comment 2 Dan Callaghan 2016-04-21 00:59:54 UTC
https://gerrit.beaker-project.org/4761

Comment 3 PaulB 2016-04-25 12:40:07 UTC
Bill,
Running remote EET with latest restraint:
 restraint-0.1.24-1*

I hit an issue with kernel/RHEL6/drivers/3rd-party,
as the runtest.sh has reference to rhts-flush.

Do you account for rhts-flush?

Best,
-pbunyan

Comment 4 Dan Callaghan 2016-04-27 03:39:39 UTC
(In reply to PaulB from comment #3)
> Do you account for rhts-flush?

I filed a separate bug for that: bug 1330816. It looks like an easy one, I think restraint can just supply a no-op implementation because restraint calls to the LC synchronously so there should be nothing to actually flush, right Bill?


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.