Bug 1321813 - [online_private_484]ProjectRequestLimit plugin configuration is missing
Summary: [online_private_484]ProjectRequestLimit plugin configuration is missing
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: OpenShift Online
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Website
Version: 3.x
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Dan Mace
QA Contact: Yanping Zhang
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-03-29 08:20 UTC by weiwei jiang
Modified: 2016-10-30 22:55 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-05-23 15:09:15 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description weiwei jiang 2016-03-29 08:20:55 UTC
Description of problem:
After the rebuild of dev-preview-int, the configuration in master-config for the bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318573 is missing now.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
dev-preview-int

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:
The configuration is missing

Expected results:
The ProjectRequestLimit plugin should work well

Additional info:

Comment 1 Abhishek Gupta 2016-03-29 23:02:09 UTC
This has now been fixed in INT

Comment 2 weiwei jiang 2016-03-30 05:33:33 UTC
Checked with dev-preview-int again, and the issue has been fixed.

Comment 3 weiwei jiang 2016-04-07 07:09:32 UTC
This issue can be reproduced on dev-preview-int again.

Comment 5 Abhishek Gupta 2016-04-08 19:46:47 UTC
This has been addressed through code (rather than config) with 3.2.0.7 and will be picked up in the next INT rebuild.

Comment 6 Dan Mace 2016-04-15 20:14:23 UTC
Should be fixed when dev-preview-int is running v3.2.0.15

Comment 7 weiwei jiang 2016-04-19 06:32:29 UTC
Since dev-preview-int can not be logged in, so will verify this then.

Comment 8 weiwei jiang 2016-04-20 06:59:49 UTC
Checked with dev-preview-int and the the projectrequest plugin works as expected again


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.