Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
DescriptionJaroslav Škarvada
2016-04-07 12:49:36 UTC
Description of problem:
There are varios rpmlint/rpmdiff problems, e.g.:
Subpackage brltty on aarch64 x86_64 ppc64 ppc64le s390x consumes library libbrlapi.so.0.6()(64bit) from subpackage brlapi but does not have explicit package version requirement.
Please add Requires: brlapi = %{version}-%{release} to brltty in the specfile to avoid the need to test interoperability between the various combinations of old and new subpackages.
Also all subpackages should have {?_isa} in their requirements.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
brltty-4.5-9.el7
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. run rpmdiff/rpmlint
Actual results:
Above mentioned problems
Expected results:
Above mentioned problems fixed
Additional info:
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.
For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.
If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-2259.html
Description of problem: There are varios rpmlint/rpmdiff problems, e.g.: Subpackage brltty on aarch64 x86_64 ppc64 ppc64le s390x consumes library libbrlapi.so.0.6()(64bit) from subpackage brlapi but does not have explicit package version requirement. Please add Requires: brlapi = %{version}-%{release} to brltty in the specfile to avoid the need to test interoperability between the various combinations of old and new subpackages. Also all subpackages should have {?_isa} in their requirements. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): brltty-4.5-9.el7 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. run rpmdiff/rpmlint Actual results: Above mentioned problems Expected results: Above mentioned problems fixed Additional info: