Bug 1324957 - Review Request: python-pypandoc - Thin wrapper for pandoc
Summary: Review Request: python-pypandoc - Thin wrapper for pandoc
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: William Moreno
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1324960
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-04-07 16:54 UTC by Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Modified: 2016-04-26 19:49 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: python-pypandoc-1.1.3-1.fc24
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-04-26 19:49:13 UTC
Type: Bug
williamjmorenor: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 2016-04-07 16:54:52 UTC
Spec URL: http://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/fedora/python-pypandoc.spec
SRPM URL: http://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/fedora/python-pypandoc-1.1.3-1.fc25.src.rpm
Description:
pypandoc provides a thin Python wrapper for pandoc, a universal
document converter, allowing parsing and conversion of
pandoc-formatted text.

Fedora Account System Username: zbyszek

Comment 1 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 2016-04-15 00:31:35 UTC
Any news here?

Comment 2 William Moreno 2016-04-19 19:29:19 UTC
Package Aproved
===============

===== MUST items =====
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
     that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
     process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
     provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

===== SHOULD items =====
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====
Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.

Rpmlint
-------
Checking: python2-pypandoc-1.1.3-1.fc23.noarch.rpm
          python3-pypandoc-1.1.3-1.fc23.noarch.rpm
          python-pypandoc-1.1.3-1.fc23.src.rpm
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

Requires
--------
python2-pypandoc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    pandoc
    pandoc-citeproc
    python(abi)

python3-pypandoc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    pandoc
    pandoc-citeproc
    python(abi)

Provides
--------
python2-pypandoc:
    python-pypandoc
    python2-pypandoc

python3-pypandoc:
    python3-pypandoc

Source checksums
----------------
https://pypi.python.org/packages/source/p/pypandoc/pypandoc-1.1.3.zip :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : ed2048a655f7bd2f80dc84d9fd81df113c78f3b31aca68dae17c1100a2c05569
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : ed2048a655f7bd2f80dc84d9fd81df113c78f3b31aca68dae17c1100a2c05569

Comment 3 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 2016-04-19 19:31:22 UTC
Thank you for the review!

Comment 4 Kevin Fenzi 2016-04-23 16:17:48 UTC
Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-pypandoc


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.