RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1325393 - Undocumented exit status 255 if --riskcheck ran too soon
Summary: Undocumented exit status 255 if --riskcheck ran too soon
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: preupgrade-assistant
Version: 6.8
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Petr Hracek
QA Contact: Alois Mahdal
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1335121
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-04-08 17:02 UTC by Alois Mahdal
Modified: 2016-11-04 08:56 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version: preupgrade-assistant-2.1.7.post18-1.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
In some cases, the "preupg --riskcheck" command returned the exit status of 225. This status is not documented and could be misinterpreted by scripting utilities. With this update, "preupg --riskcheck" returns the documented exit status of 14.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-11-04 08:56:49 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2016:2616 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE preupgrade-assistant bug fix and enhancement update 2016-11-03 16:23:38 UTC

Description Alois Mahdal 2016-04-08 17:02:54 UTC
Description of problem
======================

If `preupg --riskcheck` is ran before `preupg`, it exits with status 255.

This is not a documented exit status, thus could be misinterpreted by
scripting tools, resulting in hidden problems.


Version-Release number of selected component
============================================

preupgrade-assistant-2.1.5-4.el6.noarch


How reproducible
================

Always


Steps to Reproduce
==================

 1. Have a fresh install, or remove /root/preupgrade* directories
 2. DON'T run `preupg` but run `preupg --riskcheck`
 3. Observe exit status


Actual results
==============

Exit status is 255, which is not a documented value (preupg --help)


Expected results
================

Exit with one of documented values (currently 0-2).

Comment 2 Alois Mahdal 2016-04-08 17:21:16 UTC
Note that I have seen preupg --riskcheck exit with 255 also in other circumstances related to broken modules.  I have not been able to reproduce it reliably, though.

Hopefully once we'll have custom module set (bug 1289977 comment 1), we'll be able to catch that again.  (That would be another ticket than this one, though.)

Comment 9 Alois Mahdal 2016-10-07 04:26:48 UTC
preupgrade-assistant-ui-2.1.10-5.el6.noarch:

    [0 root@qeos-115 ~]# preupg --riskcheck; echo $?
    The 'preupg' command was not run yet. Run it to check for possible risks.
    24
    [0 root@qeos-115 ~]#

Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2016-11-04 08:56:49 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-2616.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.