Spec URL: https://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/plasma5/plasma-discover.spec SRPM URL: https://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/plasma5/plasma-discover-5.6.1-1.fc24.src.rpm Description: KDE and Plasma resources management GUI Fedora Account System Username: rdieter renamed/rebranded muon/muon-discover => plasma-discover
Not doing an official review but: - License in COPYING file says it's GPLv3 - Any reason to keep this part: # hack to avoid unused-direct-shlib-dependency rpmlint warnings #export LDFLAGS="-Wl,--as-needed %{?__global_ldflags}" ? - Not sure if there is a reason for this but: # disable update notifier applet by default sed -i \ -e 's|X-KDE-PluginInfo-EnabledByDefault=.*|X-KDE-PluginInfo-EnabledByDefault=false|g' \ notifier/plasmoid/metadata.desktop Why changing the default from upstream?
As far as license is concerned, of primary importance is the license included in the source code, which is actually a combination of: LGPLv2+, GPLv2+, and GPLv2 or GPLv3, so I'll update to License: GPLv2 or GPLv3 no reason to keep commented/unused stuff For disabling the updater applet, we do that because fedora/kde installs and uses plasma-pk-updater by default... and it would be... weird to have 2 updater applets running at the same time. So, this makes it so users will have to opt-in and manually enable it. Spec URL: https://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/plasma5/plasma-discover.spec SRPM URL: https://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/plasma5/plasma-discover-5.6.1-2.fc24.src.rpm %changelog * Sat Apr 09 2016 Rex Dieter <rdieter> - 5.6.1-2 - License: GPLv2 or GPLv3 (KDE e.V) - remove some commented/unused items from .spec - expand comment why updater applet is disabled by default Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13605229
taken for review.
Rex: Please guard out the appropriate scriptlets so that they do not run on F24+ where file triggers are in use. The list file triggers[1] and the FPC ticket for them[2] describe it in more detail. [1]: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/desktop/2015-August/012685.html [2]: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/566
Sure we can... but... are those documented in packaging guidelines anywhere ... yet? If not, I'd ask any potential reviewer to please focus only on documented review blockers for now.
That's my plan ... with an eye out "for the future".
Given the annoyance of a certain RPM bug, we aren't sure it's safe to rely on triggers in all cases so FPC hasn't documented them. We will once we know exactly which cases can be relied upon. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284645
I am running fedora-review as we speak, but looking at the spec file, it looks like update-desktop-database is missing under %post .. Detailed review to follow.
It's in %posttrans
Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Package installs properly. Note: Installation errors (see attachment) See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines ---> This is a local issue. Can be ignored. - update-desktop-database is invoked in %post and %postun if package contains desktop file(s) with a MimeType: entry. Note: desktop file(s) with MimeType entry in plasma-discover See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#desktop- database ---> Ah! The same thing I complained about! It's in posttrans. This is fine. ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "LGPL (v2.1 or later)", "GPL (v2 or v3)", "LGPL (v2.1)", "Unknown or generated". 30 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/mukundan/ownCloud/misc_pkgs/pkg_reviews/1325469-plasma- discover/licensecheck.txt ---> LGPL is missing from the license field. licensecheck.txt shows - LGPL (v2.1 or later) -------------------- discover-5.6.1/libdiscover/backends/ApplicationBackend/qoauth/src/interface.cpp discover-5.6.1/libdiscover/backends/ApplicationBackend/qoauth/src/interface.h discover-5.6.1/libdiscover/backends/ApplicationBackend/qoauth/src/interface_p.h discover-5.6.1/libdiscover/backends/ApplicationBackend/qoauth/src/qoauth_global.h discover-5.6.1/libdiscover/backends/ApplicationBackend/qoauth/src/qoauth_namespace.h LGPL (v2.1) ----------- discover-5.6.1/libdiscover/backends/ApplicationBackend/tests/modeltest.cpp discover-5.6.1/libdiscover/backends/ApplicationBackend/tests/modeltest.h There are several other files under "unknown or generated". discover-5.6.1/COPYING discover-5.6.1/Messages.sh discover-5.6.1/TODO discover-5.6.1/discover/IconColors.cpp discover-5.6.1/discover/IconColors.h discover-5.6.1/discover/MuonDiscoverMainWindow.cpp discover-5.6.1/discover/MuonDiscoverMainWindow.h discover-5.6.1/discover/PaginateModel.cpp discover-5.6.1/discover/PaginateModel.h discover-5.6.1/discover/SystemFonts.cpp discover-5.6.1/discover/SystemFonts.h discover-5.6.1/discover/autotests/IconColorsTest.cpp discover-5.6.1/discover/main.cpp discover-5.6.1/discover/qml/navigation.js discover-5.6.1/exporter/MuonExporter.cpp discover-5.6.1/exporter/MuonExporter.h discover-5.6.1/exporter/main.cpp discover-5.6.1/libdiscover/backends/ApplicationBackend/libmuonapt/AddRepositoryHelper.cpp discover-5.6.1/libdiscover/backends/ApplicationBackend/libmuonapt/AddRepositoryHelper.h discover-5.6.1/libdiscover/declarative/ApplicationProxyModelHelper.cpp discover-5.6.1/libdiscover/declarative/ApplicationProxyModelHelper.h discover-5.6.1/libdiscover/declarative/DiscoverDeclarativePlugin.cpp discover-5.6.1/libdiscover/declarative/DiscoverDeclarativePlugin.h discover-5.6.1/libdiscover/declarative/qmldir discover-5.6.1/libdiscover/resources/StandardBackendUpdater.cpp discover-5.6.1/libdiscover/resources/StandardBackendUpdater.h discover-5.6.1/notifier/DiscoverNotifierDeclarativePlugin.cpp discover-5.6.1/notifier/DiscoverNotifierDeclarativePlugin.h discover-5.6.1/notifier/plasmoid/Messages.sh discover-5.6.1/notifier/qmldir Spot check shows that several of these files (did not check each file) carry license headers - LGPL [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. ---> Looks fine. license file is installed when %{name}-libs package is installed which is required by the mail package. [!]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must be documented in the spec. ---> LGPL is missing. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. Note: No known owner of /usr/lib64/qt5/qml/org/kde ---> qt5-qtbase owns this. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/plasma/plasmoids, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/22x22, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/22x22/apps, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps, /usr/lib64/qt5/qml/org, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/128x128/apps, /usr/share/plasma, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/128x128, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable/apps, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32, /usr/share/icons/hicolor, /usr/share/kxmlgui5, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable, /usr/lib64/qt5/qml/org/kde [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib64/qt5/qml/org/kde/discover(muon-libs), /usr/share/libdiscover/categories(muon-libs), /usr/share/plasma/plasmoids/org.kde.discovernotifier/contents/ui(muon- updater), /usr/lib64/qt5/qml/org/kde/discovernotifier(muon-libs), /usr/lib64/qt5/plugins/discover-notifier(muon-libs), /usr/share/libdiscover/backends(muon-libs), /usr/lib64/qt5/plugins/discover(muon-libs), /usr/share/plasma/plasmoids/org.kde.discovernotifier(muon-updater), /usr/share/libdiscover(muon-libs), /usr/share/plasma/plasmoids/org.kde.discovernotifier/contents(muon- updater) ---> This seems ok based on "dnf repoquery --provides --resolve {path}". But, something worth taking a second look. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: The spec file handles locales properly. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: gtk-update-icon-cache is invoked in %postun and %posttrans if package contains icons. Note: icons in plasma-discover [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or desktop-file-validate if there is such a file. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. ---> Source incudes license text which is built correctly. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in plasma- discover-libs , plasma-discover-updater , plasma-discover-debuginfo ---> This is fine. plasma-discover requires plasma-discover-libs plasma-discover-updater requires plasma-discover-libs Both these have correct requires in the form - Requires: %{name}-libs%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [!]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: Mock build failed See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#rpmlint ---> This fine. Build completed fine and package can be installed. Local issue. Changing to [x]. [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. Note: Arch-ed rpms have a total of 2856960 bytes in /usr/share ---> This is fine. Files are in valid destinations. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Installation errors ------------------- INFO: mock.py version 1.2.17 starting (python version = 3.5.1)... Start: init plugins INFO: selinux enabled Finish: init plugins Start: run Start: chroot init INFO: calling preinit hooks INFO: enabled root cache INFO: enabled dnf cache Start: cleaning dnf metadata Finish: cleaning dnf metadata Mock Version: 1.2.17 INFO: Mock Version: 1.2.17 Finish: chroot init INFO: installing package(s): /home/mukundan/ownCloud/misc_pkgs/pkg_reviews/1325469-plasma-discover/results/plasma-discover-5.6.1-2.fc25.x86_64.rpm /home/mukundan/ownCloud/misc_pkgs/pkg_reviews/1325469-plasma-discover/results/plasma-discover-libs-5.6.1-2.fc25.x86_64.rpm /home/mukundan/ownCloud/misc_pkgs/pkg_reviews/1325469-plasma-discover/results/plasma-discover-updater-5.6.1-2.fc25.x86_64.rpm /home/mukundan/ownCloud/misc_pkgs/pkg_reviews/1325469-plasma-discover/results/plasma-discover-debuginfo-5.6.1-2.fc25.x86_64.rpm /home/mukundan/ownCloud/misc_pkgs/pkg_reviews/1325469-plasma-discover/results/plasma-discover-debuginfo-5.6.1-2.fc25.x86_64.rpm ERROR: Command failed. See logs for output. # /usr/bin/dnf --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ --releasever 25 --disableplugin=local --setopt=deltarpm=false install /home/mukundan/ownCloud/misc_pkgs/pkg_reviews/1325469-plasma-discover/results/plasma-discover-5.6.1-2.fc25.x86_64.rpm /home/mukundan/ownCloud/misc_pkgs/pkg_reviews/1325469-plasma-discover/results/plasma-discover-libs-5.6.1-2.fc25.x86_64.rpm /home/mukundan/ownCloud/misc_pkgs/pkg_reviews/1325469-plasma-discover/results/plasma-discover-updater-5.6.1-2.fc25.x86_64.rpm /home/mukundan/ownCloud/misc_pkgs/pkg_reviews/1325469-plasma-discover/results/plasma-discover-debuginfo-5.6.1-2.fc25.x86_64.rpm /home/mukundan/ownCloud/misc_pkgs/pkg_reviews/1325469-plasma-discover/results/plasma-discover-debuginfo-5.6.1-2.fc25.x86_64.rpm --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts Rpmlint ------- Checking: plasma-discover-5.6.1-2.fc25.x86_64.rpm plasma-discover-libs-5.6.1-2.fc25.x86_64.rpm plasma-discover-updater-5.6.1-2.fc25.x86_64.rpm plasma-discover-debuginfo-5.6.1-2.fc25.x86_64.rpm plasma-discover-5.6.1-2.fc25.src.rpm plasma-discover.x86_64: W: no-documentation plasma-discover.x86_64: W: gzipped-svg-icon /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable/apps/plasmadiscover.svgz plasma-discover.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary plasma-discover plasma-discover-libs.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Runtime -> Run time, Run-time, Rudiment plasma-discover-libs.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Runtime -> Run time, Run-time, Rudiment plasma-discover-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation plasma-discover-updater.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided muon plasma-discover-updater.x86_64: W: no-documentation plasma-discover-updater.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary plasma-discover-updater 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings. Requires -------- plasma-discover (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /bin/sh libDiscoverCommon.so()(64bit) libKF5Auth.so.5()(64bit) libKF5Codecs.so.5()(64bit) libKF5ConfigCore.so.5()(64bit) libKF5ConfigGui.so.5()(64bit) libKF5ConfigWidgets.so.5()(64bit) libKF5CoreAddons.so.5()(64bit) libKF5DBusAddons.so.5()(64bit) libKF5Declarative.so.5()(64bit) libKF5I18n.so.5()(64bit) libKF5Package.so.5()(64bit) libKF5WidgetsAddons.so.5()(64bit) libKF5XmlGui.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Core.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5.6)(64bit) libQt5DBus.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Gui.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Gui.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) libQt5Network.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Qml.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Qml.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) libQt5Quick.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Quick.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) libQt5Widgets.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Widgets.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) libQt5Xml.so.5()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) plasma-discover-libs(x86-64) rtld(GNU_HASH) plasma-discover-libs (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /sbin/ldconfig PackageKit libAppstreamQt.so.1()(64bit) libDiscoverCommon.so()(64bit) libDiscoverNotifiers.so()(64bit) libKF5Archive.so.5()(64bit) libKF5Attica.so.5()(64bit) libKF5Auth.so.5()(64bit) libKF5Codecs.so.5()(64bit) libKF5Completion.so.5()(64bit) libKF5ConfigCore.so.5()(64bit) libKF5ConfigGui.so.5()(64bit) libKF5ConfigWidgets.so.5()(64bit) libKF5CoreAddons.so.5()(64bit) libKF5I18n.so.5()(64bit) libKF5JobWidgets.so.5()(64bit) libKF5KIOCore.so.5()(64bit) libKF5KIOWidgets.so.5()(64bit) libKF5NewStuff.so.5()(64bit) libKF5Notifications.so.5()(64bit) libKF5Service.so.5()(64bit) libKF5WidgetsAddons.so.5()(64bit) libKF5XmlGui.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Core.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5.6)(64bit) libQt5DBus.so.5()(64bit) libQt5DBus.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) libQt5Gui.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Gui.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) libQt5Network.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Qml.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Qml.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) libQt5Widgets.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Widgets.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) libQt5Xml.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Xml.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpackagekitqt5.so.0()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) plasma-discover-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): plasma-discover-updater (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libDiscoverCommon.so()(64bit) libKF5Auth.so.5()(64bit) libKF5Codecs.so.5()(64bit) libKF5ConfigCore.so.5()(64bit) libKF5ConfigGui.so.5()(64bit) libKF5ConfigWidgets.so.5()(64bit) libKF5CoreAddons.so.5()(64bit) libKF5DBusAddons.so.5()(64bit) libKF5I18n.so.5()(64bit) libKF5WidgetsAddons.so.5()(64bit) libKF5XmlGui.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Core.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5.6)(64bit) libQt5DBus.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Gui.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Gui.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) libQt5Widgets.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Widgets.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) libQt5Xml.so.5()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) plasma-discover-libs(x86-64) rtld(GNU_HASH) Provides -------- plasma-discover: application() application(org.kde.discover.desktop) mimehandler(x-scheme-handler/appstream) muon muon-discover plasma-discover plasma-discover(x86-64) plasma-discover-libs: libDiscoverCommon.so()(64bit) libDiscoverNotifierDeclarativePlugin.so()(64bit) libDiscoverNotifiers.so()(64bit) libdiscoverdeclarativeplugin.so()(64bit) muon-libs plasma-discover-libs plasma-discover-libs(x86-64) plasma-discover-debuginfo: plasma-discover-debuginfo plasma-discover-debuginfo(x86-64) plasma-discover-updater: application() application(plasma-discover-updater.desktop) muon-notifier muon-updater plasma-discover-updater plasma-discover-updater(x86-64) Unversioned so-files -------------------- plasma-discover-libs: /usr/lib64/plasma-discover/libDiscoverCommon.so plasma-discover-libs: /usr/lib64/plasma-discover/libDiscoverNotifiers.so plasma-discover-libs: /usr/lib64/qt5/plugins/discover-notifier/DiscoverPackageKitNotifier.so plasma-discover-libs: /usr/lib64/qt5/plugins/discover/kns-backend.so plasma-discover-libs: /usr/lib64/qt5/plugins/discover/packagekit-backend.so plasma-discover-libs: /usr/lib64/qt5/qml/org/kde/discover/libdiscoverdeclarativeplugin.so plasma-discover-libs: /usr/lib64/qt5/qml/org/kde/discovernotifier/libDiscoverNotifierDeclarativePlugin.so Source checksums ---------------- http://download.kde.org/stable/plasma/5.6.1/discover-5.6.1.tar.xz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : d1a6715cd0498a713b803258eb0c50aa864e62cb9171db523a74ea89e16083bd CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : d1a6715cd0498a713b803258eb0c50aa864e62cb9171db523a74ea89e16083bd Generated by fedora-review 0.6.0 (3c5c9d7) last change: 2015-05-20 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -v -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 1325469 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, C/C++ Disabled plugins: Java, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6
Biggest issue is the license. Please fix that. (In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #9) > It's in %posttrans yes indeed.
I'm choosing to use the "effective" license of the combined code, opting not to list every possible license. For example, LGPL combined with GPL is effectively GPL. See also: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:FAQ?rd=Licensing/FAQ#What_is_.22effective_license.22_and_do_I_need_to_know_that_for_the_License:_tag.3F
(In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #12) > I'm choosing to use the "effective" license of the combined code, opting not > to list every possible license. > Sure. That works as well. Package APPROVED.
plasma-discover-5.6.2-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-000d305608
plasma-discover-5.6.2-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-000d305608
plasma-discover-5.6.2-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.