Created attachment 1145635 [details] The answer file I used for deployment. Description of problem: I'm trying to deploy packstack, on 2 baremetal's, controller and compute I'm using the answer file that attached after the deployment ends, with successful message, the openvswitch on the compute node shows: [root@compute ~]# ovs-vsctl show 1431f3dd-f564-4eb6-9451-d57bd216abe0 Bridge br-int fail_mode: secure Port br-int Interface br-int type: internal ovs_version: "2.4.0" the br-vlan(tunnel) was not created in the compute node. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): openstack-packstack-7.0.0-0.14 openstack-packstack-puppet-7.0.0-0.14 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.run packstack --answer-file with the answer file I have attached Actual results: br-vlan(tunnel) was not created in the openvswitch of the compute node Expected results: br-vlan(tunnel) should be created in the compute node. Additional info: When using "rhos-release 8 -p 2015-11-24.1" - the openvswitch's configuration is fine. While using the same answer file on Intel's nodes,the openvswitch's configuration deployed is fine either, so I'm attaching the hardware info: DELL PowerEdge FC430 Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme II BCM57810 10 Gigabit Ethernet
I looked into the code, in the script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/packstack/plugins/neutron_350.py under the method : def create_l2_agent_manifests(config, messages): the for loop doesn't configures the "$create_bridges" variable for the compute node.
I have proposed https://review.openstack.org/304052 with a fix. I can think of a corner case where this fix would create an unneeded bridge in the compute nodes, if we are specifying br-ex and br-vlan in a configuration (the scenario proposed in http://docs.openstack.org/mitaka/networking-guide/scenario-classic-ovs.html). This should be fixed separately, and I think it would require adding some configuration option to mark which bridges are needed for compute nodes.
automation passed https://rhos-jenkins.rhev-ci-vms.eng.rdu2.redhat.com/job/rhos-jenkins-rhos-8.0-puddle-rhel-7.2-multi-node-packstack-neutron-ml2-gre-rabbitmq-tempest-rpm-all/16/
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016:1354