Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 1325673 - [RFE] [Neutron] Role-based Access Control (RBAC) support for QoS policies
[RFE] [Neutron] Role-based Access Control (RBAC) support for QoS policies
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat OpenStack
Classification: Red Hat
Component: openstack-neutron (Show other bugs)
8.0 (Liberty)
Unspecified Unspecified
low Severity low
: ga
: 9.0 (Mitaka)
Assigned To: lpeer
Toni Freger
: FutureFeature, OtherQA, TestOnly, Triaged, ZStream
Depends On:
Blocks: 1339880
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2016-04-10 10:43 EDT by Nir Yechiel
Modified: 2016-08-24 08:53 EDT (History)
8 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: openstack-neutron-8.1.0-3.el7ost
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
This update adds Role-based Access Control (RBAC) for QoS policies. As a result, you can now apply QoS policies to certain projects. For example, you can now create a QoS policy that allows for lower-priority network traffic, and have it only apply to certain projects.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-08-24 08:53:26 EDT
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Launchpad 1512587 None None None 2016-04-10 10:47 EDT
OpenStack gerrit 250081 None None None 2016-04-10 10:50 EDT
Red Hat Product Errata RHEA-2016:1761 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Red Hat OpenStack Platform 9 General Availability Advisory 2016-08-24 12:49:52 EDT

  None (edit)
Description Nir Yechiel 2016-04-10 10:43:14 EDT
Description of problem:

The cloud admin needs to have the ability to share Neutron QoS policies between subsets of tenants instead of the all-or-nothing choice he has now.

For example, there is no way for a cloud admin to define a "platinum" policy (e.g. guaranteed BW, low latency) and making it possible only for certain tenants (the ones who actually paid for it) applying it to their ports/networks.

In a similar context, a cloud administrator may want to apply a pre-created default policy (e.g. rate limit) for newly created networks/VM's .

This feature will add more more flexibility for network management workflows and provide the admin with support for real use cases encountered in enterprise/private-cloud deployments.
Comment 2 Nir Yechiel 2016-04-10 10:49:38 EDT
Code was merged in upstream Mitaka-3. See https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/neutron-specs/specs/mitaka/rbac-qos-policies.html

    This patch implements a new database model required for the
    qos-policy RBAC support. In addition it migrates the current qos-policy
    'shared' attribute to leverage the new 'qospolicyrbacs' table.

    'shared' is no longer a property of the QosPolicy DB model. Its status
    is based on the tenant ID of the API caller. From an API perspective the
    logic remains the same - tenants will see qos-policies as 'shared=True'
    in case the qos-policy is shared with them). However, internal callers
    (e.g. plugins, drivers, services) must not check for the 'shared'
    attribute on qos-policy db objects any more.
Comment 4 Assaf Muller 2016-06-04 16:39:31 EDT
@Martin, can you please fill in doctext? Thank you.
Comment 5 Martin Lopes 2016-06-14 00:25:52 EDT
Added doctext.
Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2016-08-24 08:53:26 EDT
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2016-1761.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.