Bug 1326025 - upgrade sets the wrong repo name for satellite 6 and cdn
Summary: upgrade sets the wrong repo name for satellite 6 and cdn
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenStack
Classification: Red Hat
Component: openstack-tripleo-heat-templates
Version: 8.0 (Liberty)
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
urgent
Target Milestone: async
: 8.0 (Liberty)
Assignee: Mike Burns
QA Contact: Alexander Chuzhoy
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 1328978 1329770 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: 1329792
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-04-11 15:34 UTC by Mike Burns
Modified: 2016-04-23 02:19 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: openstack-tripleo-heat-templates-0.8.14-8.el7ost
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 1329792 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-04-20 13:04:48 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2016:0653 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Red Hat Enterprise Linux OSP 8 director Bug Fix Advisory 2016-04-20 17:02:07 UTC

Description Mike Burns 2016-04-11 15:34:04 UTC 
Description of problem:
previous release of OSP used rhel-7-server-openstack-7.0* for repository names, but OSP8 uses openstack-8* instead (not 8.0).

Upgrades changes the repos being used to 8.0 instead of 8.
Comment 2 Alexander Chuzhoy 2016-04-19 20:03:38 UTC 
Verified:
Environment:
openstack-tripleo-heat-templates-0.8.14-9.el7ost.noarch

Compared the yum repos:
Before the upgrade:
rhel-7-server-openstack-7.0-director-rpms/7Server/x86_64 
rhel-7-server-openstack-7.0-rpms/7Server/x86_64          

After passing the major-upgrade-pacemaker-init step:
rhel-7-server-openstack-8-director-rpms/7Server/x86_64 
rhel-7-server-openstack-8-rpms/7Server/x86_64          



No 8.0 ^^.
Comment 4 errata-xmlrpc 2016-04-20 13:04:48 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-0653.html
Comment 5 Mike Burns 2016-04-20 19:56:04 UTC 
*** Bug 1328978 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Ian Pilcher 2016-04-22 23:31:44 UTC 
*** Bug 1329770 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.