Bug 1326062 – [RH Ceph 2.0 - 10.1.1] test/librados/watch_notify.cc:309: Failure LibRadosWatchNotify.Watch2Timeout

Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.

Bug 1326062 - [RH Ceph 2.0 - 10.1.1] test/librados/watch_notify.cc:309: Failure LibRadosWatchNotify.Watch2Timeout

Summary:	[RH Ceph 2.0 - 10.1.1] test/librados/watch_notify.cc:309: Failure LibRadosWat...

Status:	CLOSED ERRATA

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Ceph Storage
Classification:	Red Hat
Component:	RADOS (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	2.0
Hardware:	Unspecified Unspecified

Priority	unspecified Severity unspecified
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	2.0
Assigned To:	Samuel Just
QA Contact:	Vasu Kulkarni
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2016-04-11 13:04 EDT by Vasu Kulkarni
Modified:	2017-07-30 11:14 EDT (History)
CC List:	5 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:	ceph-10.2.0-1.el7cp
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2016-08-23 15:35:44 EDT
Type:	Bug
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

External Trackers
Tracker	ID	Priority	Status	Summary	Last Updated
Ceph Project Bug Tracker	15441	None	None	None	2016-04-13 17:52 EDT
Red Hat Product Errata	RHBA-2016:1755	normal	SHIPPED_LIVE	Red Hat Ceph Storage 2.0 bug fix and enhancement update	2016-08-23 19:23:52 EDT

Groups: None (edit)

Description Vasu Kulkarni 2016-04-11 13:04:47 EDT

Description of problem:
rados test fails with random ms fails following test
test/librados/watch_notify.cc:309: Failure LibRadosWatchNotify.Watch2Timeout

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ceph version 10.1.1-1.el7cp (61adb020219fbad4508050b5f0a792246ba74dae)

How reproducible:
1/1

Steps to Reproduce:
rados/test.sh with random ms

Actual results:

2016-04-09T23:35:23.140 INFO:tasks.workunit.client.0.clara004.stdout:         api_watch_notify: [ RUN      ] LibRadosWatchNotify.AioWatchDelete
2016-04-09T23:35:23.141 INFO:tasks.workunit.client.0.clara004.stdout:         api_watch_notify: waiting up to 300 for disconnect notification ...
2016-04-09T23:35:23.142 INFO:tasks.workunit.client.0.clara004.stdout:         api_watch_notify: watch_notify2_test_errcb cookie 140434457569840 err -107
2016-04-09T23:35:23.143 INFO:tasks.workunit.client.0.clara004.stdout:         api_watch_notify: [       OK ] LibRadosWatchNotify.AioWatchDelete (1021 ms)
2016-04-09T23:35:23.144 INFO:tasks.workunit.client.0.clara004.stdout:         api_watch_notify: [ RUN      ] LibRadosWatchNotify.Watch2Timeout
2016-04-09T23:35:23.145 INFO:tasks.workunit.client.0.clara004.stdout:         api_watch_notify: waiting up to 900 for osd to time us out ...
2016-04-09T23:35:23.146 INFO:tasks.workunit.client.0.clara004.stdout:         api_watch_notify: test/librados/watch_notify.cc:309: Failure
2016-04-09T23:35:23.148 INFO:tasks.workunit.client.0.clara004.stdout:         api_watch_notify: Value of: left > 0
2016-04-09T23:35:23.149 INFO:tasks.workunit.client.0.clara004.stdout:         api_watch_notify:   Actual: false
2016-04-09T23:35:23.150 INFO:tasks.workunit.client.0.clara004.stdout:         api_watch_notify: Expected: true
2016-04-09T23:35:23.151 INFO:tasks.workunit.client.0.clara004.stdout:         api_watch_notify: [  FAILED  ] LibRadosWatchNotify.Watch2Timeout (899114 ms)

Expected results:


Additional info:

http://magna002.ceph.redhat.com/vasu-2016-04-09_11:26:14-rados:monthrash-jewel---basic-clara/217843/teuthology.log

Comment 2 Samuel Just 2016-04-13 17:52:49 EDT

Sage has a PR

Comment 3 Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) 2016-04-22 12:35:09 EDT

Looks like this was fixed upstream in v10.2.0.

Comment 5 Samuel Just 2016-05-09 16:31:20 EDT

Pending backport to hammer.

Comment 6 Samuel Just 2016-05-09 16:46:45 EDT

Oops, I changed the wrong one.  This is in 10.2.0, so I marked it POST?

Comment 7 Samuel Just 2016-05-09 17:02:28 EDT

It's in 10.2.0, so it's MODIFIED I guess

Comment 10 Vasu Kulkarni 2016-06-21 19:51:19 EDT

Verified in regression run.

Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2016-08-23 15:35:44 EDT

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-1755.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.