Bug 1326390 - [RFE] Implement Secure RBAC Project Scoped Personas within nova, placement [NEEDINFO]
Summary: [RFE] Implement Secure RBAC Project Scoped Personas within nova, placement
Keywords:
Status: ON_QA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenStack
Classification: Red Hat
Component: openstack-nova
Version: 7.0 (Kilo)
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: zstream
: 17.1
Assignee: Stephen Finucane
QA Contact: nova-maint
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 1663544 1899906 (view as bug list)
Depends On: 1228474 1801416
Blocks: 1381612
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-04-12 15:00 UTC by Jaison Raju
Modified: 2023-01-10 12:15 UTC (History)
33 users (show)

Fixed In Version: openstack-nova-23.2.1-0.20220428212241.327693a.el9ost
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 1899906 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed:
Target Upstream Version: Wallaby
pveiga: needinfo? (spower)

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
OpenStack gerrit 760240 0 None MERGED Implement secure RBAC for resource providers 2023-01-30 15:27:21 UTC
Red Hat Issue Tracker OSP-346 0 None None None 2021-12-10 14:51:12 UTC

Description Jaison Raju 2016-04-12 15:00:33 UTC 
1. Proposed title of this feature request  
Need nova policy to be configured to include a read-only role .
  
3. What is the nature and description of the request?  
Customer has requirement of read-only admin role for all core services .

4. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)  
  A read-only admin user is necessary for customer environment .
  
Additional info:
The following bug is raised for keystone to add role .
This role can be configured in policy file .
Bug 1228474 - [RFE] Read only role for tenant access (edit)
Comment 2 Jaison Raju 2016-04-12 15:03:13 UTC 
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/admin-readonly-role
Comment 4 Stephen Gordon 2016-05-06 14:32:32 UTC 
Moving to rhos-11?/Ocata for now - this is a long term goal but the ultimate solution is unlikely to be backportable to earlier releases.
Comment 14 Stephen Finucane 2020-12-01 16:47:19 UTC 
*** Bug 1899906 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 16 Stephen Finucane 2021-02-10 16:06:20 UTC 
The placement patches have merged now
Comment 17 Stephen Finucane 2021-03-30 14:49:38 UTC 
*** Bug 1663544 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.