Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 1326440

Summary: gssproxy systemd unit file contains bogus dependency on proc-fs-nfsd.mount
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: James Ralston <ralston>
Component: gssproxyAssignee: Robbie Harwood <rharwood>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Kaleem <ksiddiqu>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 7.2CC: dpal, fs-qe, jpazdziora, mkosek, pasik, sumenon, yoyang
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: gssproxy-0.7.0-7.el7 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-04-10 11:09:51 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description James Ralston 2016-04-12 16:49:05 UTC
Description of problem:

The gssproxy.service systemd unit file contains these dependencies:

After=syslog.target
Before=nfs-secure.service nfs-secure-server.service
Requires=proc-fs-nfsd.mount

The "Requires" dependency on proc-fs-nfsd.mount is completely bogus. Yes, if NFS is in use, proc-fs-nfsd.mount should be started before gssproxy.service. But in no sense does gssproxy depend on NFS. For example, we use gssproxy on our RHEL7 hosts to broker access to the Kerberos keytab file via mod_auth_gssapi.so, as described here:

https://fedorahosted.org/gss-proxy/wiki/Apache

The correct dependencies list should be:

After=syslog.target
Before=nfs-secure.service nfs-secure-server.service proc-fs-nfsd.mount

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

0:gssproxy-0.4.1-7.el7.x86_64

Comment 2 Robbie Harwood 2016-04-12 18:25:01 UTC
Note - we are waiting for changes to NFS spec files to remove these lines.  The correct way to handle this possible dependency is to have the relevant NFS services require gssproxy to be available.

Comment 3 Robbie Harwood 2017-05-02 18:38:29 UTC
(This has been fixed in Fedora.)

Comment 5 Sudhir Menon 2018-01-17 13:57:56 UTC
Verified using gssproxy-0.7.0-17.el7.x86_64 on 

[root@master sssd]# cat /etc/redhat-release 
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.5 Beta (Maipo)

[root@master sssd]# cat /usr/lib/systemd/system/gssproxy.service
[Unit]
Description=GSSAPI Proxy Daemon
# GSSPROXY will not be started until syslog is
After=syslog.target
Before=nfs-secure.service nfs-secure-server.service

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2018-04-10 11:09:51 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:0709