Description of problem: Browser support alert was implemented in webadmin header in Bug 1188229. We've had users confused by the message. Also, I personally find it very intrusive because I use Chrome and it pops up every time. We only support Firefox ESR downstream. But for upstream, practically any modern browser will work fine. Certainly every modern Chrome works. After discussing with Yaniv Kaul, he suggests completely disabling this message upstream and only enabling it downstream. This is my suggestion too. I would like PM's thoughts. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 4.0 Expected results: upstream = no compatibility message downstream = has the message
Even downstream, any modern browser will work fine. Let's remove the warning completely and follow these guidelines: https://access.redhat.com/help/browsers/
Created attachment 1149884 [details] browser support
X-Ref: https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-site/pull/219
Created attachment 1152066 [details] updated site
(In reply to Greg Sheremeta from comment #1) > Even downstream, any modern browser will work fine. GWT compiler targets a limited set of user agents (browsers), for oVirt the current list is following: - IE10 and better - Firefox - Chrome and Safari Given that above are the mainstream browsers, I'm OK with removing the "browser unsupported" alert message in WebAdmin UI.
> - IE10 and better > - Firefox > - Chrome and Safari Forgot to mention, that ^^ should apply to oVirt 3.6 as well.
Should this message be displayed in RHEVM or not? Because the message is gone in both RHEVM 3.6 and oVirt 3.6 for all browsers I tried (Firefox 46, Chrome 50 and 52, Vivaldi 1.1) ovirt-engine-3.6.7-0.0.master.20160506053801.gitee34ba4.el6.noarch rhevm-3.6.6.2-0.1.el6.noarch
See comment 1. It should be completely removed.
Yeah, in comment 1 is "completely disabling this message upstream and only enabling it downstream", that's the reason for my question, because that's not how it works now. In downstream (RHEVM) the message is not appearing as well, but according to comment 1 it should.
Nah, comment 0 (original text) is that. Comment 1 changed it. Sorry for the confusion. Comment 1 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326511#c1 Please mark as verified. You're good.
OK, then this works as expected :)