Bug 132661 - different wireless configurations must be manually activated
Summary: different wireless configurations must be manually activated
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: initscripts
Version: 3
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Bill Nottingham
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2004-09-15 17:07 UTC by Jon Nettleton
Modified: 2014-03-17 02:48 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-09-30 21:55:30 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
first attempt at a function to return wireless ap's (591 bytes, patch)
2004-09-15 17:19 UTC, Jon Nettleton
no flags Details | Diff
when initializing wireless we should scan to see if any ap's are preconfigured (805 bytes, patch)
2004-09-15 17:28 UTC, Jon Nettleton
no flags Details | Diff
nicely formatted patch for network-functions (640 bytes, patch)
2004-09-15 19:06 UTC, Jon Nettleton
no flags Details | Diff

Description Jon Nettleton 2004-09-15 17:07:44 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040914
Firefox/0.10

Description of problem:
The init process does not provide a good way for a wireless user to
activate different network configurations without manual intervention.
 As a laptop user that uses wireless at a variety of locations I
constantly have to boot up then go to network device control and
activate a profile with a different essid and wireless key.  It would
be much nicer if on boot a generic wireless config was activated, and
if the card supported wireless scanning, it would choose a
configuration file that matched a broadcast essid.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
initscripts-7.80-1

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Boot laptop with wireless card in.
2.See the network not initialize
3.Open Network Device Control and manually select a different
configuration.
    

Additional info:

Comment 1 Jon Nettleton 2004-09-15 17:19:52 UTC
Created attachment 103871 [details]
first attempt at a function to return wireless ap's

This function uses iwlist to get a list of available ESSID's and the quality of
their signal.  It then sorts the ESSID's by signal.  It returns all the essid's
found ignoring any ap's with hidden essid's or essid's made up of entirely
spaces.  All essid's are then manipulated so spaces and -'s are changed to _'s.

Comment 2 Jon Nettleton 2004-09-15 17:28:35 UTC
Created attachment 103872 [details]
when initializing wireless we should scan to see if any ap's are preconfigured

This changes the default behaviour of what is done when a card returns
is_wireless_device = true.  It brings up the link on the wireless device then
calls the scan_wireless_ap function to get an ordered list of available ap's. 
It then checks if a configuration file exists with a name of
ifcfg-DEVICE_ESSID.  ESSID has all space's and -'s changed to _'s as needed by
the system_network_config utility.  The behaviour is setting the main
ifcfg-DEVICE with onboot=YES or hotplug=yes, this initializes the device scan's
and then ifup's any configurations it finds.

Comment 3 Jon Nettleton 2004-09-15 19:06:48 UTC
Created attachment 103878 [details]
nicely formatted patch for network-functions

I accidentally uploaded my ugly all in one line function.  This patch has a
more readable formatting.

Comment 4 Bill Nottingham 2004-09-15 21:20:41 UTC
Interesting, but you might as well look for a HWADDR that matches that
has ESSID for the appropriate value in it, as opposed to doing it by
filename.

You may also want to look at NetworkManager.

Comment 5 Jon Nettleton 2004-09-15 23:13:33 UTC
The reason that I am not looking only for a HWADDR to ESSID
relationship is that it leaves the problem that two profiles with the
same HWADDR and ESSID have been created.  The only guarantee of not
running into duplicates are filenames on the filesystem.

I am trying to approach this from a systems administrator viewpoint if
they were solely using the system-config-network-gui utility.  They
could very easily create a default profile and then copy that wireless
profile customizing it per location.  This allows you to setup static
wireless configurations that any user on the machine can use, but not
change.  It also allows static ip addresses to be used if so desired.

I have tried NetworkManager and I think it will be great for a per
user coffee shop quick setup.  However it doesn't read the ifcfg files
for ESSID information of pre-configured ESSID's.  This means every
user needs the KEY for an AP in their gnome-keyring.  NetworkManager
also can't start until after dbus and hal are setup, which is well
after the point in the init process where the rest of the Networking
is setup so things like ntp will always fail.

I do see that in the ifup portion of my patches I need to check to see
if USERCTL is set and whether HWADDR matches before deciding that the
specified file is actually the one that should be ifup'd.  

I really just think that this approach gives a greater flexibility in
the boot process, using already existing information.


Comment 6 Bill Nottingham 2004-09-16 01:54:28 UTC
Why would anyone have two profiles with the same HWADDR and ESSID?
Seriously, I'm not sure I see the usage case for that.

You can also just scan for the essid in the file instead of
hwaddr+essid; it accomplishes the same thing.

Comment 7 Jon Nettleton 2004-09-16 02:39:05 UTC
Currently you can only add one KEY per profile so it is plausible that
an administrator that has a single ESSID, but different key's per
location would create multiple profiles.  I wouldn't do it, my patches
don't take it into account, but they prevent it from incorrectly
choosing a profile.  
This is the same reason I don't just scan for an ESSID.  There is
nothing that is stopping an admin from creating multiple profiles with
the same ESSID, one configured with dhcp, the other with a static ip
address.  
I am not claiming that my solution is the most elegant, I am just
trying to provide a solution that has the least amount of gotchas,
without doing a major overhaul to the network admin gui.  
It is very true that there might not be use cases to do something, but
the gui lets you do it.  That inevitably means that people using the
gui will do it and it can lead to problems.
My only claim is if a wireless card has scanning enabled, and profiles
are setup as ifcfg-DEVICE_essid, that the correct profile will be
chosen on ifup of the main device.  This is caveated with the fact I
need to do some more checking in ifup for USERCTL and HWADDR.


Comment 8 Bill Nottingham 2005-09-30 21:55:30 UTC
With the continuing use of NetworkManager, I'm not going to change this in this
way; eventually most of the networking stuff will get replaced with calls into
NetworkManager.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.