Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 1327729 - Setting Image Metadata for an Image is accepting number, where it should accept only String (True/False)
Setting Image Metadata for an Image is accepting number, where it should acce...
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Classification: Red Hat
Component: RBD (Show other bugs)
2.0
x86_64 Unspecified
unspecified Severity medium
: rc
: 2.0
Assigned To: Jason Dillaman
Tanay Ganguly
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2016-04-15 14:24 EDT by Tanay Ganguly
Modified: 2017-07-30 11:29 EDT (History)
11 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: RHEL: ceph-10.2.2-1.el7cp Ubuntu: ceph_10.2.2-3redhat1xenial
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-08-23 15:36:33 EDT
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2016:1755 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Red Hat Ceph Storage 2.0 bug fix and enhancement update 2016-08-23 19:23:52 EDT

  None (edit)
Description Tanay Ganguly 2016-04-15 14:24:04 EDT
Description of problem:
Setting Image Metadata for an Image is accepting number, where it should accept only String

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
10.1.1.1

How reproducible:
NA

e.g.

rbd image-meta set Tanay-RBD/CLOOONE1 rbd_cache_writethrough_until_flush 512
rbd image-meta set Tanay-RBD/CLOOONE1 rbd_cache 1024

rbd_cache_writethrough_until_flush and rbd_cache should accept only True and False, rather it is accepting numeric value as well.
Comment 2 Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) 2016-04-26 17:09:03 EDT
Jason, would you be able to land a fix in jewel upstream a week from now (May 2nd)?
Comment 3 Jason Dillaman 2016-04-26 18:00:50 EDT
Ken: highly unlikely to land next week.
Comment 4 Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) 2016-04-26 20:02:21 EDT
Ok, I recommend we re-target to RHCS 2.1. Neil/Federico?
Comment 5 Neil Levine 2016-05-06 16:07:41 EDT
+1
Comment 6 Jason Dillaman 2016-05-27 15:23:23 EDT
Upstream PR: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/9280
Comment 11 Jason Dillaman 2016-06-12 19:58:31 EDT
Merged, upstream Jewel PR: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/9554
Comment 19 errata-xmlrpc 2016-08-23 15:36:33 EDT
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-1755.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.