Bug 1327784 - Review Request: nauty - Graph canonical labeling and automorphism group computation
Summary: Review Request: nauty - Graph canonical labeling and automorphism group compu...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Björn 'besser82' Esser
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-04-15 23:18 UTC by Jerry James
Modified: 2016-05-07 11:59 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-05-07 11:59:21 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
besser82: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Jerry James 2016-04-15 23:18:15 UTC
Spec URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/nauty/nauty.spec
SRPM URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/nauty/nauty-2.6.4-1.fc25.src.rpm
Fedora Account System Username: jjames
Description: Nauty and Traces are programs for computing automorphism groups of graphs and digraphs. (At present, Traces does not accept digraphs.) They can also produce a canonical label. They are written in a portable subset of C, and run on a considerable number of different systems.

There is a small suite of programs called gtools included in the package. For example, geng can generate non-isomorphic graphs very quickly. There are also generators for bipartite graphs, digraphs, and multigraphs, and programs for manipulating files of graphs in a compact format.

The Fedora package was modeled on the Debian package in hopes that cross-distro compatibility might help consumers of this package.

Comment 1 Björn 'besser82' Esser 2016-04-16 07:05:50 UTC
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
=======
- Package installs properly.
  Note: Installation errors (see attachment)
  See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines

  ---> known bug in f-r

- All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
  are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
  Note: These BR are not needed: gcc
  See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2

  ---> hint leads to outdated guidelines, ignoring


===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Public
     domain". 95 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
     licensecheck in
     /home/besser82/shared/fedora/reviews/1327784-nauty/licensecheck.txt
     
     ---> License is ASL-2.0 and Public Domain, please fix during import

[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).

     ---> except for naming the sub-packages, but that is cosmetic

[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 542720 bytes in 5 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
     Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in libnauty
     , nauty-debuginfo

     ---> that fine, debuginfo is autogenerated, libnauty is fine standalone

[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
     justified.
[x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro.
[x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[!]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: Mock build failed
     See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#rpmlint

     ---> know bug in f-r

[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
     is arched.
[x]: Package should not use obsolete m4 macros
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Installation errors
-------------------
INFO: mock.py version 1.2.17 starting (python version = 3.5.1)...
Start: init plugins
INFO: selinux enabled
Finish: init plugins
Start: run
Start: chroot init
INFO: calling preinit hooks
INFO: enabled root cache
INFO: enabled dnf cache
Start: cleaning dnf metadata
Finish: cleaning dnf metadata
Mock Version: 1.2.17
INFO: Mock Version: 1.2.17
Finish: chroot init
INFO: installing package(s): /home/besser82/shared/fedora/reviews/1327784-nauty/results/nauty-2.6.4-1.fc25.x86_64.rpm /home/besser82/shared/fedora/reviews/1327784-nauty/results/libnauty-2.6.4-1.fc25.x86_64.rpm /home/besser82/shared/fedora/reviews/1327784-nauty/results/libnauty-devel-2.6.4-1.fc25.x86_64.rpm /home/besser82/shared/fedora/reviews/1327784-nauty/results/nauty-debuginfo-2.6.4-1.fc25.x86_64.rpm /home/besser82/shared/fedora/reviews/1327784-nauty/results/nauty-debuginfo-2.6.4-1.fc25.x86_64.rpm
ERROR: Command failed. See logs for output.
 # /usr/bin/dnf --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ --releasever 25 --disableplugin=local --setopt=deltarpm=false install /home/besser82/shared/fedora/reviews/1327784-nauty/results/nauty-2.6.4-1.fc25.x86_64.rpm /home/besser82/shared/fedora/reviews/1327784-nauty/results/libnauty-2.6.4-1.fc25.x86_64.rpm /home/besser82/shared/fedora/reviews/1327784-nauty/results/libnauty-devel-2.6.4-1.fc25.x86_64.rpm /home/besser82/shared/fedora/reviews/1327784-nauty/results/nauty-debuginfo-2.6.4-1.fc25.x86_64.rpm /home/besser82/shared/fedora/reviews/1327784-nauty/results/nauty-debuginfo-2.6.4-1.fc25.x86_64.rpm --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: nauty-2.6.4-1.fc25.x86_64.rpm
          libnauty-2.6.4-1.fc25.x86_64.rpm
          libnauty-devel-2.6.4-1.fc25.x86_64.rpm
          nauty-debuginfo-2.6.4-1.fc25.x86_64.rpm
          nauty-2.6.4-1.fc25.src.rpm
nauty.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) automorphism -> metamorphism
nauty.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US automorphism -> metamorphism
nauty.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gtools -> tools, stools, g tools
nauty.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US geng -> gen, gene, gens
nauty.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multigraphs -> lithographs
libnauty.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) automorphism -> metamorphism
libnauty.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Nauty -> Nasty, Natty, Naughty
libnauty.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US automorphism -> metamorphism
libnauty.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US nauty -> nasty, natty, naughty
libnauty.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libnautyS1.so.2.6.4 exit.5
libnauty.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libnautyA1.so.2.6.4 exit.5
libnauty.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libnautyL0.so.2.6.4 exit.5
libnauty.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libnautyS0.so.2.6.4 exit.5
libnauty.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libnautyW0.so.2.6.4 exit.5
libnauty.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libnautyW1.so.2.6.4 exit.5
libnauty.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libnautyL1.so.2.6.4 exit.5
libnauty.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libnauty.so.2.6.4 exit.5
libnauty-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
nauty.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) automorphism -> metamorphism
nauty.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US automorphism -> metamorphism
nauty.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gtools -> tools, stools, g tools
nauty.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US geng -> gen, gene, gens
nauty.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multigraphs -> lithographs
5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 23 warnings.




Requires
--------
nauty-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):

libnauty-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /usr/bin/pkg-config
    libnauty(x86-64)
    libnauty.so.2()(64bit)
    libnautyA1.so.2()(64bit)
    libnautyL0.so.2()(64bit)
    libnautyL1.so.2()(64bit)
    libnautyS0.so.2()(64bit)
    libnautyS1.so.2()(64bit)
    libnautyW0.so.2()(64bit)
    libnautyW1.so.2()(64bit)

nauty (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    coreutils
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libgmp.so.10()(64bit)
    libm.so.6()(64bit)
    libnauty(x86-64)
    libnauty.so.2()(64bit)
    libnauty.so.2(LIBNAUTY_2.5)(64bit)
    libnautyL1.so.2()(64bit)
    libnautyL1.so.2(LIBNAUTYL1_2.5)(64bit)
    libnautyW1.so.2()(64bit)
    libnautyW1.so.2(LIBNAUTYW1_2.5)(64bit)
    libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
    libz.so.1()(64bit)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)

libnauty (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /sbin/ldconfig
    ld-linux-x86-64.so.2()(64bit)
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)



Provides
--------
nauty-debuginfo:
    nauty-debuginfo
    nauty-debuginfo(x86-64)

libnauty-devel:
    libnauty-devel
    libnauty-devel(x86-64)
    pkgconfig(nauty)

nauty:
    nauty
    nauty(x86-64)

libnauty:
    libnauty
    libnauty(x86-64)
    libnauty.so.2()(64bit)
    libnauty.so.2(LIBNAUTY_2.5)(64bit)
    libnautyA1.so.2()(64bit)
    libnautyA1.so.2(LIBNAUTYA1_2.5)(64bit)
    libnautyL0.so.2()(64bit)
    libnautyL0.so.2(LIBNAUTYL0_2.5)(64bit)
    libnautyL1.so.2()(64bit)
    libnautyL1.so.2(LIBNAUTYL1_2.5)(64bit)
    libnautyS0.so.2()(64bit)
    libnautyS0.so.2(LIBNAUTYS0_2.5)(64bit)
    libnautyS1.so.2()(64bit)
    libnautyS1.so.2(LIBNAUTYS1_2.5)(64bit)
    libnautyW0.so.2()(64bit)
    libnautyW0.so.2(LIBNAUTYW0_2.5)(64bit)
    libnautyW1.so.2()(64bit)
    libnautyW1.so.2(LIBNAUTYW1_2.5)(64bit)



Source checksums
----------------
http://pallini.di.uniroma1.it/nauty26r4.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : a1c8326cbe955a967a0f1747cc2ae04569cced1ac7cf92c9309c843f5c2c2a98
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : a1c8326cbe955a967a0f1747cc2ae04569cced1ac7cf92c9309c843f5c2c2a98


Generated by fedora-review 0.6.0 (3c5c9d7) last change: 2015-05-20
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1327784 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, C/C++
Disabled plugins: Java, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby
Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6

===== Solution =====

Package approved!  Have fun.

Comment 2 Jerry James 2016-04-16 19:53:56 UTC
Thank you very much for the speedy review, Björn.  I will fix the license field on import as requested.

Comment 3 Gwyn Ciesla 2016-04-17 13:59:13 UTC
Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/nauty

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2016-04-22 12:57:48 UTC
nauty-2.6.5-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-1c5728a7a8

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2016-04-23 21:23:09 UTC
nauty-2.6.5-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-1c5728a7a8

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2016-05-07 11:59:19 UTC
nauty-2.6.5-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.