Bug 1328889 - Review Request: libiomp - Intel OpenMP runtime library
Summary: Review Request: libiomp - Intel OpenMP runtime library
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-04-20 13:35 UTC by Dave Love
Modified: 2020-07-15 09:28 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-07-15 09:28:32 UTC
Type: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Dave Love 2016-04-20 13:35:25 UTC
Spec URL: https://loveshack.fedorapeople.org/review/libiomp.spec
SRPM URL: https://loveshack.fedorapeople.org/review/libiomp-20160322-3.el6.src.rpm
Description: 
Intel OpenMP Runtime Library built for GCC.  It may be linked instead
of libgomp.

This may be faster (or slower) than libgomp in some circumstances, it
supports the OMPT profiling interface, has more flexible control of
affinity, supports OpenMP 4.5 features not in GCC5's runtime, and
might have other advantages or disadvantages.

This package also provides a compatibility libgomp.

Fedora Account System Username: loveshack

I don't have good distinguishing benchmarks for this v. GOMP (despite people claiming it's a lot better), but packaging it maybe removes an excuse for using a proprietary compiler.

Comment 1 Dave Love 2016-04-20 13:39:17 UTC
I forgot to add, built under
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/loveshack/livhpc/build/172600/

Comment 2 Orion Poplawski 2016-04-25 21:15:34 UTC
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Downstream_.so_name_versioning

Have you contacted upstream about providing a soname?

Comment 3 Dave Love 2016-04-26 14:51:11 UTC
Oh, I hadn't realized it was a requirement -- too much in the instructions to memorize...

I'm sure they won't do it, as this is what Intel ship with their compiler, but I'll try via the "forum", which unfortunately seems to be the only contact.

Comment 4 Package Review 2020-07-10 00:54:36 UTC
This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry
it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software
into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the
NEEDINFO flag.

You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version
available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase
chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you
need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned
and will be closed.
Thank you for your patience.

Comment 5 Dave Love 2020-07-15 09:28:32 UTC
I thought I'd cancelled this as the library is now shipped with clang, though it needs fixing to substitute for libgomp.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.