Bug 132919 - updates to samba missing i386 package
Summary: updates to samba missing i386 package
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: samba
Version: 2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jay Fenlason
QA Contact: David Lawrence
URL: https://www.redhat.com/archives/amd64...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2004-09-19 16:44 UTC by D. Hugh Redelmeier
Modified: 2014-08-31 23:26 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-09-20 16:07:46 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description D. Hugh Redelmeier 2004-09-19 16:44:07 UTC
Description of problem:
Certain packages (mostly library packages) come in pairs on x86_64: 
one for x86_64 and one for i386.  This is to allow i386 programs to be
run on an x86_64 system.

One of these packages is samba.

The Fedora Core 2 Update: samba-3.0.7-2.FC2 (FEDORA-2004-305) did not
include x86_64/samba-3.0.7-2.FC2.i386.rpm.  As a result, the update
cannot be applied.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
x86_64/samba-3.0.7-2.FC2.i386.rpm.

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. rpm -Fv samba-3.0.7-2.FC2.x86_64.rpm \
       samba-client-3.0.7-2.FC2.x86_64.rpm \
       samba-common-3.0.7-2.FC2.x86_64.rpm \
       samba-swat-3.0.7-2.FC2.x86_64.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
        samba-common = 0:3.0.3 is needed by (installed) samba-3.0.3-5


2.
3.
  
Actual results:
see above error message

Expected results:
clean application of update.

Additional info:

Apparently i386/samba-3.0.7-2.FC2.i386.rpm is identical to what
x86_64/samba-3.0.7-2.FC2.i386.rpm should have been: just copy it!
This should be done by Red Hat, in
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/updates/2/x86_64/

Comment 1 Jay Fenlason 2004-09-20 14:47:19 UTC
Add the i386 fc2 repository to your /etc/yum.conf so up2date can 
find the i386 rpms of all multiarch packages (including Samba.) 

Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 2004-09-20 16:07:46 UTC
Fixing.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.