Description of problem: The upgrade command doesn't behave consistently with local file argument (file.rpm) and pkg_spec argument. With rpm file skip-broken behavior is not applied. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download newer version of installed package (a) that require upgrade dep (b) 2. dnf --exclude=b --setopt=strict=False upgrade a.rpm c (FAIL) 3. dnf --exclude=b --setopt=strict=False upgrade a c (Succeed - c is upgraded) Actual results: See Steps to reproduce. Expected results: Step no. 2 succeed with same result like step no. 3. Additional info
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component.
This message is a reminder that Fedora 23 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 23. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '23'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 23 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
The problem was solved by refactored downgrade command and added honor of strict option for downgrade command