Bug 1330288 - Unable to switch from list view to grid/tile view on Configured Systems page
Summary: Unable to switch from list view to grid/tile view on Configured Systems page
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine
Classification: Red Hat
Component: UI - OPS
Version: 5.6.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
medium
Target Milestone: GA
: 5.6.0
Assignee: Milan Zázrivec
QA Contact: Nandini Chandra
URL:
Whiteboard: ui:config_manager
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-04-25 19:27 UTC by Nandini Chandra
Modified: 2016-06-29 15:54 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 5.6.0.8
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-06-29 15:54:39 UTC
Category: ---
Cloudforms Team: ---
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2016:1348 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE CFME 5.6.0 bug fixes and enhancement update 2016-06-29 18:50:04 UTC

Description Nandini Chandra 2016-04-25 19:27:34 UTC
Description of problem:
---------------------


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
----------------------
5.6.0.4


How reproducible:
-----------------
Always


Steps to Reproduce:
-------------------
1.Navigate to the Configuration Page.
2.Click 'Configured Systems' accordion.
3.Click either 'Foreman Configured Systems' or 'Ansible Tower Configured Systems'


Actual results:
--------------
Unable to switch from list view to grid/tile view.


Expected results:
----------------
It should be possible to switch from list view to grid/tile view.


Additional info:
----------------

Comment 2 Harpreet Kataria 2016-05-13 21:24:55 UTC
Milan, 

This may have already been fixed, can you verify and add details if this has been fixed.

Thanks,
~Harpreet

Comment 3 Milan Zázrivec 2016-05-16 16:03:28 UTC
https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/pull/8734

Comment 4 CFME Bot 2016-05-18 22:40:50 UTC
New commit detected on ManageIQ/manageiq/master:
https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/commit/058236c4154cd35ae69eaf1dad72d6a680f8d7e4

commit 058236c4154cd35ae69eaf1dad72d6a680f8d7e4
Author:     Milan Zazrivec <mzazrivec>
AuthorDate: Mon May 16 17:47:46 2016 +0200
Commit:     Milan Zazrivec <mzazrivec>
CommitDate: Tue May 17 16:27:52 2016 +0200

    Use decorators for icon names in conf. provider objects
    
    This would allow us to get rid if if(ModelName) ... switches in
    views and controllers.
    
    Also, it will fix some errors occuring when switching between
    GTL views.
    
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330288

 app/controllers/application_controller.rb                 |  6 +-----
 app/controllers/provider_foreman_controller.rb            | 10 ----------
 app/decorators/configuration_profile_decorator.rb         | 15 +++++++++++++++
 app/decorators/configured_system_decorator.rb             | 11 +++++++++++
 .../manageiq/providers/configuration_manager_decorator.rb | 13 +++++++++++++
 app/models/configuration_profile.rb                       |  4 ++++
 app/models/configured_system.rb                           |  4 ++++
 .../providers/ansible_tower/configuration_manager.rb      |  4 ++++
 .../manageiq/providers/foreman/configuration_manager.rb   |  4 ++++
 app/views/layouts/quadicon/_single_quad.html.haml         | 14 +++++---------
 10 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 app/decorators/configuration_profile_decorator.rb
 create mode 100644 app/decorators/configured_system_decorator.rb
 create mode 100644 app/decorators/manageiq/providers/configuration_manager_decorator.rb

Comment 5 Nandini Chandra 2016-06-02 15:45:33 UTC
Verified in 5.6.0.8

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2016-06-29 15:54:39 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016:1348


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.