RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1333903 - [SELinux]: Found avc of type=USER_AVC for class dbus during glusterfs-ganesha validation -RHEL7
Summary: [SELinux]: Found avc of type=USER_AVC for class dbus during glusterfs-ganesha...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: selinux-policy
Version: 7.2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
high
urgent
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Lukas Vrabec
QA Contact: Milos Malik
Marie Hornickova
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1312809
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-05-06 15:37 UTC by Marcel Kolaja
Modified: 2016-06-23 05:52 UTC (History)
17 users (show)

Fixed In Version: selinux-policy-3.13.1-60.el7_2.5
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
When the nfs-ganesha server was set up on four nodes with 2X2 volume, the volume was not exported after the nfs-ganesha service was enabled. With this update, a workaround has been provided which ensures that the volume is exported as expected in the described scenario.
Clone Of: 1312809
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-06-23 05:52:33 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2016:1279 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE selinux-policy bug fix update 2016-06-23 09:52:11 UTC

Description Marcel Kolaja 2016-05-06 15:37:59 UTC
This bug has been copied from bug #1312809 and has been proposed
to be backported to 7.2 z-stream (EUS).

Comment 9 Shashank Raj 2016-05-17 10:48:18 UTC
With the latest selinux-policy-3.13.1-60.el7_2.5, we are hitting an issue where refresh config performed on a volume fails with below AVC's.

type=USER_AVC msg=audit(1463442563.908:18059): pid=652 uid=81 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:system_dbusd_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 msg='avc:  denied  { send_msg } for msgtype=method_return dest=:1.3872 spid=12852 tpid=21897 scontext=system_u:system_r:glusterd_t:s0 tcontext=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tclass=dbus  exe="/usr/bin/dbus-daemon" sauid=81 hostname=? addr=? terminal=?''

We need to have a fix for this as well

Comment 10 Milos Malik 2016-05-26 08:00:44 UTC
I'm going to switch this bug to VERIFIED, because latest selinux-policy packages contain the fix needed for RHEL-7.2.z. The USER_AVC mentioned in comment#9 is addressed in BZ#1336760, which was proposed for RHEL-7.2.z but did not get rhel-7.2.z+ flag yet.

Comment 13 errata-xmlrpc 2016-06-23 05:52:33 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016:1279


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.