Spec URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/gap-pkg-polenta/ SRPM URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/gap-pkg-polenta/gap-pkg-polenta-1.3.6-1.fc25.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: jjames Description: The Polenta package provides methods to compute polycyclic presentations of matrix groups (finite or infinite). As a by-product, this package gives some functionality to compute certain module series for modules of solvable groups. For example, if G is a rational polycyclic matrix group, then we can compute the radical series of the natural Q[G]-module Q^d.
Jerry you're missing the spec file in the comment above. Although I can get it from the SRPM I'd appreciate it if you could add a fresh comment with both spec and srpm as per usual fedora reviews.
Oops. The spec file was actually there, I just copied the wrong URL. Try this: Spec URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/gap-pkg-polenta/gap-pkg-polenta.spec SRPM URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/gap-pkg-polenta/gap-pkg-polenta-1.3.6-1.fc25.src.rpm
Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated Issues =========== * Documentation in /usr (%{_gap_dir}) - This is standard for GAP packages as it's used for runtime online docs * Assuming functional based on %check passing ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated". 13 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/james/workspace/fedora-scm/1333916 -gap-pkg-polenta/licensecheck.txt [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [!]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 3 files. [!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: gap-pkg-polenta-1.3.6-1.fc25.noarch.rpm gap-pkg-polenta-1.3.6-1.fc25.src.rpm gap-pkg-polenta.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Polycyclic -> Poly cyclic, Poly-cyclic, Polyclinic gap-pkg-polenta.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US polycyclic -> poly cyclic, poly-cyclic, polyclinic gap-pkg-polenta.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib gap-pkg-polenta.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Polycyclic -> Poly cyclic, Poly-cyclic, Polyclinic gap-pkg-polenta.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US polycyclic -> poly cyclic, poly-cyclic, polyclinic gap-pkg-polenta.src: W: invalid-url Source0: https://github.com/gap-packages/polenta/releases/download/v1.3.6/polenta-1.3.6.tar.bz2 HTTP Error 403: Forbidden 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- sh: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory gap-pkg-polenta.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Polycyclic -> Poly cyclic, Poly-cyclic, Polyclinic gap-pkg-polenta.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US polycyclic -> poly cyclic, poly-cyclic, polyclinic gap-pkg-polenta.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. Requires -------- gap-pkg-polenta (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): gap-core gap-pkg-alnuth gap-pkg-polycyclic gap-pkg-radiroot Provides -------- gap-pkg-polenta: gap-pkg-polenta Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/gap-packages/polenta/releases/download/v1.3.6/polenta-1.3.6.tar.bz2 : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : a812d92b3cb6760025c36025d1730d0b5efb7135ee8af8948a7a199c04ae4182 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : a812d92b3cb6760025c36025d1730d0b5efb7135ee8af8948a7a199c04ae4182 Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 1333916 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6 ===== RESULT ===== Package review is APPROVED
Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/gap-pkg-polenta
gap-pkg-polenta-1.3.6-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-a51c5e78f9
gap-pkg-polenta-1.3.6-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-a51c5e78f9
gap-pkg-polenta-1.3.6-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.