Version-Release number of selected component: evolution-data-server-3.20.1-2.fc24 Additional info: reporter: libreport-2.7.0 backtrace_rating: 4 cmdline: /usr/libexec/evolution-calendar-factory-subprocess --factory ews --bus-name org.gnome.evolution.dataserver.Subprocess.Backend.Calendarx1897x5 --own-path /org/gnome/evolution/dataserver/Subprocess/Backend/Calendar/1897/5 crash_function: g_main_context_ref executable: /usr/libexec/evolution-calendar-factory-subprocess global_pid: 2116 kernel: 4.5.3-300.fc24.x86_64 pkg_fingerprint: 73BD E983 81B4 6521 pkg_vendor: Fedora Project reproducible: Not sure how to reproduce the problem runlevel: unknown type: CCpp uid: 1000 Truncated backtrace: Thread no. 1 (10 frames) #0 g_main_context_ref at gmain.c:520 #1 soup_socket_set_property at soup-socket.c:338 #2 object_set_property at gobject.c:1421 #3 g_object_new_internal at gobject.c:1835 #4 g_object_new_valist at gobject.c:2040 #5 soup_socket_new at soup-socket.c:823 #6 soup_connection_connect_async at soup-connection.c:414 #7 get_connection at soup-session.c:1969 #8 soup_session_process_queue_item at soup-session.c:1996 #9 async_run_queue at soup-session.c:2095 Potential duplicate: bug 1306905
Created attachment 1157522 [details] File: backtrace
Created attachment 1157523 [details] File: cgroup
Created attachment 1157524 [details] File: core_backtrace
Created attachment 1157525 [details] File: dso_list
Created attachment 1157526 [details] File: environ
Created attachment 1157527 [details] File: exploitable
Created attachment 1157528 [details] File: limits
Created attachment 1157529 [details] File: maps
Created attachment 1157530 [details] File: mountinfo
Created attachment 1157531 [details] File: namespaces
Created attachment 1157532 [details] File: open_fds
Created attachment 1157533 [details] File: proc_pid_status
Created attachment 1157534 [details] File: var_log_messages
Thanks for a bug report. to be honest, I also do not know what could happen here. I see almost all threads being in generic_getcwd() call, which is confusing for me, because I didn't see this function in the backtrace yet (or I do not recall it seeing, at least). ABRT found a possible duplicate, bug #1306905, and I tend to agree with it. I'm closing this as a duplicate of it. Please try to watch for a reproducer, it will be very helpful. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1306905 ***
*** Bug 1388054 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***