Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 1337199

Summary: confusing message while installing module while it is disabled on another prio
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: Dalibor Pospíšil <dapospis>
Component: policycoreutilsAssignee: Vit Mojzis <vmojzis>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Jan Zarsky <jzarsky>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 7.3CC: dwalsh, jzarsky, lvrabec, mgrepl, mmalik, plautrba, ssekidde
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: policycoreutils-2.5-23.el7 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-10-30 09:46:22 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Dalibor Pospíšil 2016-05-18 13:28:45 UTC
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
policycoreutils-2.5-2.el7

How reproducible:
100%

Actual results:
have a built module my_module.pp
# semodule -i ./my_module.pp
# semodule -d my_module
# semodule -lfull | grep my_module
400 my_module         pp disabled
# semodule -X 500 -i ./my_module.pp
libsemanage.semanage_direct_install_info: Overriding my_module module at lower priority 400 with module at priority 500.
libsemanage.semanage_direct_install_info: my_module module will be disabled after install due to default enabled status.  <------ this message is confusing, especially that 'default enabled status' part.

Expected results:
the message should simply say that the module will be disabled as there is already disabled 'sibling'

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2018-10-30 09:46:22 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:3098