RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1337259 - [IMAPx] Disable and hide "Use Quick Resync if the server supports it"
Summary: [IMAPx] Disable and hide "Use Quick Resync if the server supports it"
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: evolution-data-server
Version: 7.3
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Milan Crha
QA Contact: Desktop QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-05-18 16:04 UTC by Matěj Cepl
Modified: 2016-11-04 00:25 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: evolution-data-server-3.12.11-32.el7
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-11-04 00:25:49 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2016:2206 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE evolution-data-server bug fix update 2016-11-03 13:23:16 UTC

Description Matěj Cepl 2016-05-18 16:04:03 UTC
Description of problem:
Hi, I have been told today that yet another error popping up on my Evolution (for the Red Hat Zimbra account) is probably caused by the option Quick Resync being switched on (I don't know why, I know it is not a default, but I have been carrying this profile for a long long time, so who knows how it did happen). And just when I switched it off for one account, in the other account (plain dovecot) I got some other error claiming that QRESYNC command failed.

If the QRESYNC setting is still unfinished and not enterprise ready, why do we have it even allowed to be switched on in RHEL. Couldn't we hide it in the settings dialogs?

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
evolution-3.12.11-18.el7.x86_64
evolution-data-server-3.12.11-31.el7.x86_64

How reproducible:
errors are popping up all the time

Comment 1 Milan Crha 2016-05-18 16:23:28 UTC
Thanks for a bug report. You are right that the QResync either works, or breaks things heavily. I recall a user whom claimed that he has a new message on the server, but not shown in the evolution. We realized after some investigation that it was the QResync, which caused the misbehaviour in the new message delivery.

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2016-11-04 00:25:49 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-2206.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.