Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1337772

Summary:	[Docs][RFE][Director] Undercloud supported virtualization platforms documentation
Product:	Red Hat OpenStack	Reporter:	Keith Basil <kbasil>
Component:	documentation	Assignee:	Dan Macpherson <dmacpher>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	RHOS Documentation Team <rhos-docs>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	10.0 (Newton)	CC:	dbecker, dcain, derekh, dmacpher, dyasny, jdonohue, kbasil, lbopf, mburns, mcornea, morazi, rhel-osp-director-maint, smerrow, sputhenp, srevivo
Target Milestone:	ga	Keywords:	Documentation, FutureFeature, Triaged
Target Release:	10.0 (Newton)
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2017-02-23 08:07:01 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1335593, 1368482

Description Keith Basil 2016-05-20 03:35:59 UTC

Cloud operators want to be able to deploy a virtualized undercloud.

Comment 1 Mike Orazi 2016-06-17 16:36:18 UTC

Anecdotally several people are using virtualized underclouds.  Are there specific functional gaps that need to be addressed or is this more a request to provide documentation around the supported VM sizes and virt networking configuration?

Comment 5 Keith Basil 2016-09-16 13:32:08 UTC

Updated BZ title to more accurately reflect scope of the ask.

Comment 10 Dmitry Tantsur 2016-12-06 15:20:03 UTC

*** Bug 1368466 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 12 Dan Macpherson 2017-02-03 01:43:14 UTC

@Derek and Keith -- I was CC'd on an email thread asking if RHEV 4 was supported (it's not on the list). Was there any reason it wasn't included?

Comment 13 Derek Higgins 2017-02-13 15:54:51 UTC

(In reply to Dan Macpherson from comment #12)
> @Derek and Keith -- I was CC'd on an email thread asking if RHEV 4 was
> supported (it's not on the list). Was there any reason it wasn't included?

As a starting point the hypervisors listed were taken from the list of hypervisors on which RHEL is supported[1], I see RHEV 4 is on that list but perhaps it wasn't when this document was put together.


[1] - https://access.redhat.com/certified-hypervisors

Comment 14 Dan Macpherson 2017-02-14 02:27:40 UTC

Thanks, Derek.

Just FYI, we've had a documentation request for it and QE are currently testing OSP10 on RHV4. They have identified an issue with conflicting RHEL versions (OSP10 requires RHEL7.3 while I think RHV4.0 has only been tested with RHEL7.2 at this stage), but it shouldn't affect the OSP10 on RHV4 to any great degree.

Comment 15 Dan Macpherson 2017-02-23 08:07:01 UTC

Closing this BZ as the content is now live in the documentation. If further changes are requires, please feel free to reopen this BZ.

Just a side note, QE have tested RHOSP10 on RHV4.0 and RHV4.1-Beta with success. I've also added a note that the virt platforms must support the RHEL OS version of the undercloud node (i.e. 7.3 at the moment, 7.4 in spring).