Bug 1340511
| Summary: | NO_PROXY setting for 172.30.x.x and 10.1.x.x CIDR values in /etc/sysconfig/docker from ansible installation | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Shanna Chan <shchan> |
| Component: | Installer | Assignee: | Scott Dodson <sdodson> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Ma xiaoqiang <xiama> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 3.2.0 | CC: | aos-bugs, bleanhar, jokerman, mmccomas, shchan, xtian |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2016-06-09 20:14:49 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Shanna Chan
2016-05-27 15:57:13 UTC
Unfortunately I think this is a known problem right now. However, you should be able to set openshift_no_proxy in your inventory. What that already set? [Was] that already set? :) We did change the no_proxy in docker config file's values from CIDR to the actual IPs of the registry, but it was not obvious that where the problem were (with the help with support). Hope this will be fixed soon. Thanks & regards, Shanna Sorry, I probably wasn't clear enough. Is Ansible in use at all? If so, is the openshift_no_proxy setting in the inventory? I want to make sure that is working as expected. There's no sensible solution to performing an installation and at the same time ensuring that docker has the registry's service ip address added to its NO_PROXY list. The real solution to this is to push to the registry based on dns name and that's blocked on https://github.com/openshift/origin/issues/8581 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1242961 *** The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days |