Bug 1341053
| Summary: | [RFE] Openshift session affinity : deactivation of container affinity cookie on routing layer | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Alexander Koksharov <akokshar> |
| Component: | RFE | Assignee: | Ben Bennett <bbennett> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Johnny Liu <jialiu> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 3.1.0 | CC: | aos-bugs, jokerman, mmccomas |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2016-07-18 19:27:36 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1278851 *** |
Description of problem: > Do you have any proposal or RFE to make regarding session affinity. At present there isn't any proposal yet. > > Please let me know what you are looking for so that I can discuss it to check if Engineering has some plans. I think the fact is quite simple (of course it's always easy on paper ;) ) : - a route could have a session affinity property (as the service has one), affinity implemented or not using pod cookie - a route, built on a service, could inherit this property from this service used for its creation With this behavior, a stateless (no affinity) service publicated through a route, would not have any affinity session/pod neither through service access neither through route access. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: