Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 1341114 - [packaging] pcs should mark known (existing or not) %config files in the spec (/etc/sysconfig/pcsd, /var/lib/pcsd/tokens, ...)
[packaging] pcs should mark known (existing or not) %config files in the spec...
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: pcs (Show other bugs)
7.1
Unspecified Unspecified
low Severity unspecified
: rc
: ---
Assigned To: Ivan Devat
cluster-qe@redhat.com
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2016-05-31 05:56 EDT by Jan Pokorný
Modified: 2016-11-03 16:58 EDT (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: pcs-0.9.152-2.el7
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-11-03 16:58:55 EDT
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2016:2596 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Moderate: pcs security, bug fix, and enhancement update 2016-11-03 08:11:34 EDT

  None (edit)
Description Jan Pokorný 2016-05-31 05:56:17 EDT
# rpm -qf /var/lib/pcsd/tokens      
> file /var/lib/pcsd/tokens is not owned by any package

It's up to the consideration if this file should not be tracked as well.
If so, the current behavior on upgrades would be retained using
"%config %ghost" tagging (a requirement to reauthenticate upon each
pcs update is hardly desirable).

As a bonus, the mentioned file would be listed with 'rpm -qc pcs'.
Moreover, that query currently shows nothing(!), which I call solidly
broken when there are files likes /etc/sysconfig/pcsd that should
definitely be listed.

See also:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Logfiles
Comment 1 Jan Pokorný 2016-05-31 05:58:51 EDT
Also COPYING file should rather be tagged with %license so that it's
shown with "rpm -qL pcs".
Comment 3 Tomas Jelinek 2016-06-07 10:20:38 EDT
pcsd configs:
/var/lib/pcsd/cfgsync_ctl
/var/lib/pcsd/pcsd.cookiesecret
/var/lib/pcsd/pcsd.crt
/var/lib/pcsd/pcsd.key
/var/lib/pcsd/pcs_settings.conf
/var/lib/pcsd/pcs_users.conf
/var/lib/pcsd/tokens
Comment 4 Ivan Devat 2016-06-22 08:16:14 EDT
Before fix:
[vm-rhel72-1 /] $ rpm -q pcs
pcs-0.9.143-15.el7.x86_64
[vm-rhel72-1 /] $ rpm -qc pcs

After Fix:
[vm-rhel72-1 ~] $ rpm -q pcs
pcs-0.9.152-1.el7.x86_64
[vm-rhel72-1 ~] $ rpm -qc pcs
/etc/sysconfig/pcsd
/var/lib/pcsd/cfgsync_ctl
/var/lib/pcsd/pcs_settings.conf
/var/lib/pcsd/pcs_users.conf
/var/lib/pcsd/pcsd.cookiesecret
/var/lib/pcsd/pcsd.crt
/var/lib/pcsd/pcsd.key
/var/lib/pcsd/tokens
Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2016-11-03 16:58:55 EDT
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2596.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.