From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030516 Mozilla Firebird/0.6 Description of problem: Some necessary development 64-bit libraries are not available on the ppc64 release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3. For example the following libraries are not available: /usr/kerberos/lib64/libcom_err.a /usr/kerberos/lib64/libcom_err.so /usr/kerberos/lib64/libdes425.a /usr/kerberos/lib64/libdes425.so /usr/kerberos/lib64/libdyn.a /usr/kerberos/lib64/libdyn.so /usr/kerberos/lib64/libgssapi_krb5.a /usr/kerberos/lib64/libgssapi_krb5.so /usr/kerberos/lib64/libgssrpc.a /usr/kerberos/lib64/libgssrpc.so /usr/kerberos/lib64/libk5crypto.a /usr/kerberos/lib64/libk5crypto.so /usr/kerberos/lib64/libkadm5clnt.a /usr/kerberos/lib64/libkadm5clnt.so /usr/kerberos/lib64/libkadm5srv.a /usr/kerberos/lib64/libkadm5srv.so /usr/kerberos/lib64/libkdb5.a /usr/kerberos/lib64/libkdb5.so /usr/kerberos/lib64/libkrb4.a /usr/kerberos/lib64/libkrb4.so /usr/kerberos/lib64/libkrb5.a /usr/kerberos/lib64/libkrb5.so /usr/kerberos/lib64/libkrb524.a /usr/kerberos/lib64/libpty.a /usr/kerberos/lib64/libpty.so /usr/kerberos/lib64/libss.a A Red Hat engineer informs me that a krb5-devel-*.ppc64 package will need to be created (alongside krb5-devel-*.ppc). The package should be built something like rpmbuild --rebuild --target ppc64 krb5-devel*.src.rpm This request asks for that package to be created and made available. This is needed to successfully create 64-bit applications. Dennis. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): krb5-devel-1.2.7-24 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. This is an enhancement request Additional info:
I filed four enhancement requests (for ppc64 packages), those packages were: e2fsprogs-devel krb5-devel openldap-devel openssl-devel The first request of which (e2fsprogs-devel) has been rejected by Bill Nottingham, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=134188 Just making you guys aware of this. It may mean the closing of this request along similar lines. Note, without the above 64-bit development packages 64-bit binary production is made difficult. Dennis.
Apologies for letting this one fall through the cracks -- I think the rationale for closing #134188 means I need to close this one, too. The set of packages for development on the non-default architecture's been expanded in RHEL 4 and again in RHEL 5 (where this package first appears), but I don't think that most of the work needed for various packages is going to be backported to version 3. Closing as resolved in the current release.