Bug 1342249 - nothing provides python2-acme = 0.5.0 needed by python2-letsencrypt-0.5.0-1.fc23.noarch
Summary: nothing provides python2-acme = 0.5.0 needed by python2-letsencrypt-0.5.0-1.f...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: letsencrypt
Version: 23
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: James Hogarth
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-06-02 18:13 UTC by Doug Maxey
Modified: 2016-06-03 08:28 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-06-02 18:20:06 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 1096506 0 unspecified CLOSED promoting 'install a' to 'install b' when b obsoletes a 2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC

Internal Links: 1096506

Description Doug Maxey 2016-06-02 18:13:09 UTC
Description of problem:

Am finally being forced to update the certs, noticed that letsencrypt has been removed on all my systems. 

Re-install attempt provides the above message.

Rooting around the web, noticed that a previous version required python2-acme-0.4.0.  Is there some hard dependency on a version?  

Would this be fixable with a '>=' in the rpm build?

# dnf install letsencrypt
Last metadata expiration check: 1:28:33 ago on Thu Jun  2 11:27:27 2016.
Error: nothing provides python2-acme = 0.5.0 needed by python2-letsencrypt-0.5.0-1.fc23.noarch
(try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages)

--allowerasing did not change anything.

Comment 1 James Hogarth 2016-06-02 18:20:06 UTC
There's a hard dependency by design upstream.

The version of acme needs to match.

Please note that letsencrypt has been obsoleted by certbot and a general dnf upgrade should pull in certbot 0.6.0 along with acme 0.6.0, and 0.7.0 of each are in the testing repositories.

Here's the F23 bodhi update:

https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/certbot-0.6.0-2.fc23%20python-acme-0.6.0-1.fc23

Comment 2 James Hogarth 2016-06-02 18:51:28 UTC
Hmm actually on a quick test in a clean F23 VM ...

[root@f23template ~]# dnf install letsencrypt
Fedora 23 - x86_64 - Updates                                                          2.9 MB/s |  22 MB     00:07    
Fedora 23 - x86_64                                                                    3.4 MB/s |  43 MB     00:12    
Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:21 ago on Thu Jun  2 19:45:03 2016.
Error: nothing provides python2-acme = 0.5.0 needed by python2-letsencrypt-0.5.0-1.fc23.noarch
(try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages)
[root@f23template ~]# 


[root@f23template ~]# dnf provides letsencrypt
#Last metadata expiration check: 0:03:16 ago on Thu Jun  2 19:45:03 2016.
certbot-0.6.0-2.fc23.noarch : A free, automated certificate authority client
Repo        : updates

letsencrypt-0.5.0-1.fc23.noarch : A free, automated certificate authority client
Repo        : updates

_____________________________________

Looks like dnf is being a bit odd with the provider resolution ...

I guess because letsencrypt matches specifically?

Well if rpm -q letsencrypt shows it installed on your system a dnf update will switch you to certbot, if it's not then dnf install certbot is what you need.

Comment 3 James Hogarth 2016-06-02 18:54:20 UTC
Final note on this ... on F24 it behaves as expected as letsencrypt doesn't exist in that repo:

sudo dnf install letsencrypt
[sudo] password for james: 
firmware for qemu, built by jenkins, fresh from  34 kB/s |  13 kB     00:00    
Dependencies resolved.
================================================================================
 Package                  Arch    Version                Repository        Size
================================================================================
Installing:
 certbot                  noarch  0.7.0-1.fc24           updates-testing   20 k
 dialog                   x86_64  1.3-3.20160209.fc24    fedora           227 k
 python-parsedatetime     noarch  1.5-3.fc24             fedora            65 k
 python-zope-component    noarch  4.2.2-3.fc24           fedora           117 k
 python-zope-event        noarch  4.2.0-1.fc24           fedora           178 k
 python-zope-interface    x86_64  4.1.3-4.fc24           fedora           145 k
 python2-acme             noarch  0.7.0-1.fc24           updates-testing  165 k
 python2-certbot          noarch  0.7.0-1.fc24           updates-testing  343 k
 python2-configargparse   noarch  0.10.0-2.fc24          fedora            32 k
 python2-configobj        noarch  5.0.6-4.fc24           fedora            66 k
 python2-dialog           noarch  3.3.0-8.fc24           fedora            99 k
 python2-funcsigs         noarch  0.4-3.fc24             fedora            30 k
 python2-mock             noarch  1.3.0-1.fc24           fedora           128 k
 python2-ndg_httpsclient  noarch  0.4.0-3.fc24           fedora            51 k
 python2-pbr              noarch  1.8.1-4.fc24           fedora           258 k
 python2-pyrfc3339        noarch  1.0-3.fc24             fedora            18 k

Transaction Summary
================================================================================
Install  16 Packages

Total download size: 1.9 M
Installed size: 7.5 M
Is this ok [y/N]: n

And the obsolete and provides is present on certbot properly in F23 ... 

[root@f23template ~]# dnf repoquery --obsoletes certbot
Last metadata expiration check: 0:06:41 ago on Thu Jun  2 19:45:03 2016.
letsencrypt < 0.6.0
[root@f23template ~]# dnf repoquery --provides certbot
Last metadata expiration check: 0:08:56 ago on Thu Jun  2 19:45:03 2016.
certbot = 0.6.0-2.fc23
letsencrypt = 0.6.0-2.fc23

Comment 4 James Hogarth 2016-06-02 19:01:51 UTC
*Really* final word this time .. you got bit by this: bz#1096506 

I'll open a rel-eng ticket to remove the old letsencrypt package entirely from the F23 repos to prevent this happening.

Comment 5 Doug Maxey 2016-06-02 19:11:30 UTC
Ah, ok.  Missed the cerbot part.  

Thanks for the quick response.

Comment 6 Doug Maxey 2016-06-02 20:09:06 UTC
(In reply to Doug Maxey from comment #5)
> Ah, ok.  Missed the cerbot part.  
> 
> Thanks for the quick response.

To expand a bit, apparently cerbot has been installed, replacing letsencrypt, but I failed to notice the change.

Comment 7 James Hogarth 2016-06-02 20:23:57 UTC
Well at least the obsoletes did the right thing there!

There should be a symlink so the letsencrypt command still works... but the actual command now is certbot (all arguments otherwise the same).


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.