Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 1343690

Summary: [RFE] gpgcheck performed by yum does not actually validate rpm contents against GPG signature
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: Valentina Mukhamedzhanova <vmukhame>
Component: yumAssignee: Michal Domonkos <mdomonko>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Jan Blazek <jblazek>
Severity: urgent Docs Contact: Marie Hornickova <mdolezel>
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 7.4CC: alex, carlwgeorge, james.antill, jblazek, klaas, ksrot, mdomonko, mjahoda, ovasik, pasik, qe-baseos-security, walters
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: FutureFeature, Patch
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: yum-3.4.3-154.el7 Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
New `payload_gpgcheck` option added to *yum* With this update, the new configuration option `payload_gpgcheck` has been added to the *yum* utility. This option enables a GNU Privacy Guard (GPG) signature check on the payload sections of packages, thus enhancing the security and integrity when installing packages. Previously, when `gpgcheck` option was enabled, *yum* only performed a GPG signature check on headers. Consequently, if the payload data were tampered with or corrupted, RPM unpacking error occurred, and the package was left in a partly installed state. This might have put the operating system into an inconsistent and vulnerable state. You can use the new `payload_gpgcheck` option in conjunction with the `gpgcheck` or `localpkg_gpgcheck` options to prevent this problem. As a result, when `payload_gpgcheck` is enabled, *yum* performs a GPG signature check on the payload and aborts the transaction if it is not verified. Using `payload_gpgcheck` is equivalent to manually running "rpm -K" on downloaded packages.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1287883
: 1343692 1578345 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-08-01 09:07:52 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1343692    
Bug Blocks: 1380360, 1393866    
Attachments:
Description Flags
pkgsplit.tar.gz none

Comment 6 Michal Domonkos 2017-03-23 13:16:28 UTC
Created attachment 1265740 [details]
pkgsplit.tar.gz

Scripts to alter the payload of a signed package so that it no longer verifies (for testing purposes).

Comment 18 errata-xmlrpc 2017-08-01 09:07:52 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:2295