Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Created attachment 1165725[details]
Screen shot of issue
Description of problem:
The drop down menu for composite content view versions are not sorted in numerical order
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
6.1.8
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create 76 versions of a content view
2. View the drop down of versions on the Composite Content View Build page
Actual results:
The versions are not sorted numerically
Expected results:
The versions should be sorted numerically
Additional info:
Attached is a screen shot of the issue. The sorting is correct on the list of versions but on drop down menus, they are not.
Thank you for your interest in Satellite 6. We have evaluated this request, and we do not expect this to be implemented in the product in the foreseeable future. We are therefore closing this out as WONTFIX. If you have any concerns about this, please feel free to contact Rich Jerrido or Bryan Kearney. Thank you.
FailedQA.
@Satellite 6.7.0 Snap5
tfm-rubygem-katello-3.14.0-0.4.rc2.el7sat.noarch
used the manual reproducer described in comment#0
1. Create 12 versions of a Content View
2. View the drop down of versions on the Composite Content View Build page
Satellite 6.6.0 (reproducer):
Always Use Latest (Currently 12.0)
12.0
11.0
9.0
6.0
5.0
2.0
10.0
8.0
7.0
4.0
3.0
1.0
>>> reproduced, dropdown items are not sorted
vs.
Satellite 6.7.0 Snap5 (fix):
Always Use Latest (Currently 12.0)
9.0
8.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
12.0
11.0
10.0
1.0
>>> failed, dropdown items are sorted *alphabetically* (should be numerically instead)
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.
For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.
If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:1454
Created attachment 1165725 [details] Screen shot of issue Description of problem: The drop down menu for composite content view versions are not sorted in numerical order Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 6.1.8 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Create 76 versions of a content view 2. View the drop down of versions on the Composite Content View Build page Actual results: The versions are not sorted numerically Expected results: The versions should be sorted numerically Additional info: Attached is a screen shot of the issue. The sorting is correct on the list of versions but on drop down menus, they are not.