RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1345755 - Support for specifying IPA lightweight CA
Summary: Support for specifying IPA lightweight CA
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: certmonger
Version: 7.3
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Jan Cholasta
QA Contact: Kaleem
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1200731
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-06-13 06:49 UTC by Jan Cholasta
Modified: 2016-11-04 07:50 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version: certmonger-0.78.4-3.el7
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
IdM now supports sub-CAs Previously, Identity Management (IdM) only supported one certificate authority (CA) that was used to sign all certificates issued within the IdM domain. Now, you can use lightweight sub-CAs for better control over the purpose for which a certificate can be used. For example, a Virtual Private Network (VPN) server can be configured to only accept certificates issued by a sub-CA created for that purpose, rejecting certificates issued by other sub-CAs, such as a smart card CA. To support this functionality, you can now specify an IdM lightweight sub-CA when requesting a certificate with certmonger. For details, see https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7-Beta/html-single/Linux_Domain_Identity_Authentication_and_Policy_Guide/index.html#lightweight-sub-cas
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-11-04 07:50:44 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
console.log (1.99 KB, text/plain)
2016-09-20 06:20 UTC, Abhijeet Kasurde
no flags Details


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHEA-2016:2519 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE certmonger bug fix update 2016-11-03 14:15:16 UTC

Description Jan Cholasta 2016-06-13 06:49:52 UTC
This bug is created as a clone of upstream ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/certmonger/ticket/51

Certmonger needs a way to specify an IPA lightweight CA name when
requesting a certificate.  It is the Certmonger side of
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4559.

Design page: http://www.freeipa.org/page/V4/Sub-CAs#Certmonger

Comment 6 Abhijeet Kasurde 2016-08-17 08:54:47 UTC
Marking as FailedQA as found following bug - BZ1367683

Comment 9 Abhijeet Kasurde 2016-09-20 06:16:59 UTC
Verified using IPA and Certmonger version::
ipa-server-4.4.0-12.el7.x86_64
certmonger-0.78.4-3.el7.x86_64


Marking BZ as verified.

Comment 10 Abhijeet Kasurde 2016-09-20 06:20:12 UTC
Created attachment 1202712 [details]
console.log

Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2016-11-04 07:50:44 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2016-2519.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.