Bug 1346924 - gcc.x86_64.rpm conflicts with gcc.i686.rpm
Summary: gcc.x86_64.rpm conflicts with gcc.i686.rpm
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: gcc
Version: 25
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jakub Jelinek
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-06-15 16:17 UTC by Martin Cermak
Modified: 2017-12-07 12:11 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-12-07 12:11:47 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Martin Cermak 2016-06-15 16:17:17 UTC
Hello, on my f23 workstation I see:

=======
Error: Transaction check error:
  file /usr/libexec/getconf/default from install of gcc-5.3.1-6.fc23.i686 conflicts with file from package gcc-5.3.1-6.fc23.x86_64
=======

Seems to happen on rawhide too:

=======
Error: Transaction check error:
  file /usr/libexec/getconf/default from install of gcc-6.1.1-2.fc25.i686 conflicts with file from package gcc-6.1.1-2.fc25.x86_64
=======

Comment 1 Jakub Jelinek 2016-06-15 16:22:43 UTC
That is completely intentional.  From gcc subpackages, generally, lib* except for libstdc++-docs and libgcj-src packages are multilib, all others are not, and only go for the primary architecture.
So, if gcc.i686 appears in the Fedora x86_64 repo, it is either a rel-eng bug, or a bug in whatever package contains some bogus dependencies.

Comment 2 Martin Cermak 2016-06-15 16:49:51 UTC
Understood.  One can hit this with default configuration when attempting to install it explicitly with `dnf install gcc.i686`. It's in the repo:

=======
# yumdownloader gcc.i686 --urls

...

https://mirror.umd.edu/fedora/linux/updates/23/x86_64/g/gcc-5.3.1-6.fc23.i686.rpm
#
=======

Maybe it might get removed.  Or this bug just closed, sorry :-)  Will try what relengs say when it's already on the table.

Comment 3 Jan Kurik 2016-07-26 04:21:57 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 25 development cycle.
Changing version to '25'.

Comment 4 Fedora End Of Life 2017-11-16 18:43:19 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 25 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 25. It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time
this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora  'version'
of '25'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version'
to a later Fedora version.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not
able to fix it before Fedora 25 is end of life. If you would still like
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version
of Fedora, you are encouraged  change the 'version' to a later Fedora
version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes
bugs or makes them obsolete.

Comment 5 Marek Polacek 2017-12-07 12:11:47 UTC
Not a GCC bug.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.